ML Candidate Prediction System for Engagement Probability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Entities face inefficiencies and high costs in identifying candidates likely to engage with them due to large populations and resource-intensive manual processes, where many potential candidates have a low likelihood of engagement.

Innovation Solution

The use of machine learning techniques to predict the probability of candidates taking specific actions, such as becoming members or purchasing products, by analyzing demographic and enrichment data, and training models based on previous candidate outcomes, allowing for personalized candidate lists to be generated.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processes are used to identify candidates, then entities can potentially contact all possible candidates, but the time and resources expended are excessive and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecandidate identification efficiencyVSAvoidtime to identify candidates
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating engagement probabilities for all possible candidates using machine learning models before the actual candidate selection process. This allows entities to quickly identify high-probability candidates without manual screening, resolving the contradiction between thorough identification and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of candidate screening with an automated machine learning system that processes candidate data and predicts engagement probabilities computationally. This substitution dramatically improves productivity while reducing the time loss associated with manual evaluation of each candidate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If entities contact all possible candidates, then no potential engagement opportunities are missed, but resources are wasted on candidates with low likelihood of engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement opportunity captureVSAvoidresources expended on low-probability candidates
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by differentiating candidate evaluation based on individual characteristics and predicted engagement probabilities. Instead of treating all candidates uniformly, the system identifies and focuses resources on specific high-probability candidates while reducing or eliminating contact with low-probability candidates, thus capturing real engagement opportunities without wasting resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of candidate selection from binary (contact/not contact) to probabilistic (engagement probability threshold). By calculating and comparing engagement probabilities against threshold values, the system dynamically determines which candidates warrant resource investment, maintaining reliability of capturing opportunities while optimizing resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are trained on comprehensive data, then prediction accuracy improves, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement probability prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and utilizes only the most relevant features and data elements from comprehensive candidate information for training machine learning models. By identifying and extracting key predictive features rather than processing all available data, the system maintains high prediction accuracy while reducing computational complexity and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20230135135A1Predicting outcomes of interest
Publication Date: 2023.05.04 AM MOBILEAPPS LLC
  • US20230135135A1 patent drawing
  • US20230135135A1 patent drawing
  • US20230135135A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples are disclosed that relate to determining probabilities for possible candidates taking an action of interest. One example provides a computing system comprising a logic subsystem and a storage subsystem comprising instructions executable to obtain a list of possible candidates and enrichment data for each possible candidate. The instructions are further executable to, for each possible candidate on the list of possible candidates, determine a confidence regarding an identity of the possible candidate based at least on the enrichment data, when the confidence regarding the identity of the possible candidate satisfies a threshold condition, determine, by inputting information regarding the identity and the enrichment data into a trained machine learning model, a probability that the possible candidate will take an action of interest, and when the probability meets a threshold probability, add the possible candidate to a list of candidates, and output the list of candidates.