Machine Learning Card Authentication Technique Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack the ability to determine which authentication technique, zero-dollar authentication or tokenization, to use for a financial payment card to maximize successful authentication and minimize costs, as both techniques yield different results for various cards and incur varying costs.

Innovation Solution

A computerized tool employing machine learning models, such as binary classifiers or neural networks, to select the appropriate authentication technique based on attribute vectors associated with financial payment cards, optimizing the likelihood of successful authentication and minimizing costs by electronically determining whether to use zero-dollar authentication or tokenization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If zero-dollar authentication is used for all financial payment cards, then authentication reliability is improved, but authentication cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication success rateVSAvoidauthentication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different authentication techniques to different financial payment cards based on their specific attributes. The machine learning model analyzes card-specific features (such as card type, issuer, amount) and determines the most appropriate authentication method for each individual card, rather than applying a uniform authentication approach to all cards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the authentication approach based on input parameters including card attributes, transaction amount, and merchant information. The machine learning model processes these varying parameters to select between zero-dollar authentication and tokenization authentication, adapting the authentication strategy to the specific conditions of each transaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If tokenization authentication is used for all financial payment cards, then authentication cost is reduced, but authentication reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication costVSAvoidauthentication success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of card attributes and transaction parameters before selecting the authentication method. The machine learning model evaluates multiple factors in advance (card type, issuer, transaction amount, merchant category) to predict which authentication technique will be most effective, preventing authentication failures before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses historical authentication data and outcomes to continuously improve its selection accuracy. By analyzing past authentication results and card characteristics, the machine learning model refines its predictions to better determine when to use zero-dollar authentication versus tokenization authentication, improving overall success rates while managing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If authentication technique selection is made without machine learning, then system complexity is reduced, but authentication efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidauthentication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model serves as an intermediary layer between the transaction request and the authentication execution. It takes card attributes and transaction parameters as input, processes them through learned patterns, and outputs the optimal authentication technique selection, thereby automating a complex decision-making process that would otherwise require manual rule-based configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system autonomously determines the appropriate authentication method without requiring manual intervention or complex rule-based configuration. The machine learning model self-adjusts based on historical data and automatically selects authentication techniques, reducing the need for human expertise in configuring authentication policies while improving decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12045817B2Card authentication technique selection via machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 PAYPAL INC
  • US12045817B2 patent drawing
  • US12045817B2 patent drawing
  • US12045817B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques for facilitating card authentication technique selection via machine learning are provided. In various embodiments, a processor can access an attribute vector associated with a financial payment card. In various instances, the processor can determine, via execution of a machine learning model, whether to authenticate the financial payment card with a zero-dollar authentication technique or instead with a tokenization authentication technique, based on the attribute vector. In various cases, the processor can execute the zero-dollar authentication technique with respect to the financial payment card, when the processor determines that the financial payment card should be authenticated with the zero-dollar authentication technique. In various aspects, the processor can execute the tokenization authentication technique with respect to the financial payment card, when the processor determines that the financial payment card should be authenticated with the tokenization authentication technique.