Machine Learning for Catalyst Structure Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack a reliable set of empirical parameters or design principles for predicting the activity, product purity, and selectivity of chromium-based catalysts for ethylene trimerization and tetramerization, particularly for producing 1-hexene and 1-octene, which are crucial for industrial applications.

Innovation Solution

A computational method involving transition-state models and machine learning is used to design and develop heteroatomic ligand-metal compound complexes, such as Cr N-phosphinamidine complexes, to enhance activity, productivity, and selectivity for ethylene oligomerization, by identifying key structural and electronic features that affect ground and transition states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional empirical methods are used for catalyst design, then the design process is simple, but the prediction accuracy of catalyst activity, product purity, and selectivity is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces machine learning models as intermediaries between computational chemistry calculations and experimental catalyst performance. The ML models are trained on computational data (transition state energies, molecular descriptors) and serve as predictive tools that bridge the gap between complex quantum mechanical calculations and practical catalyst design, enabling accurate predictions without requiring full computational analysis for each new catalyst candidate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computational screening and machine learning training before actual catalyst synthesis and testing. By pre-training ML models on computational datasets and using them to identify promising catalyst candidates, the approach eliminates the need for exhaustive experimental testing of all possible catalysts, thereby improving prediction accuracy while managing computational resources efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If computational methods are used to improve catalyst selectivity and activity, then product purity and selectivity increase, but the time and resources required for catalyst development increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop where computational results and experimental data are continuously fed back into the machine learning models to improve their predictive accuracy. This iterative refinement process allows the system to learn from both successful and unsuccessful catalyst attempts, progressively improving product purity predictions and reducing development time for subsequent catalyst generations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies molecular descriptors and structural parameters of ligands in computational studies to identify optimal ranges for catalyst performance. By analyzing how changes in specific molecular parameters affect selectivity and activity, the approach accelerates catalyst optimization without requiring exhaustive experimental exploration of all parameter combinations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If extensive computational analysis is performed to optimize catalyst performance, then activity and productivity improve, but the complexity of the design process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses on the most critical molecular descriptors and structural features that dominate catalyst performance, rather than analyzing all possible molecular properties. By identifying and concentrating computational efforts on the key parameters that most strongly correlate with activity and productivity, the approach achieves high catalyst performance while reducing design process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12102992B2Machine learning and statistical analysis for catalyst structure prediction and design
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL COMPANY LP
  • US12102992B2 patent drawing
  • US12102992B2 patent drawing
  • US12102992B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a heteroatomic ligand-metal compound complex transition-state model which has been developed for activity, purity, and/or selectivity for selective ethylene oligomerizations, and density functional theory calculations for determining heteroatomic ligand-metal compound complex reactivity, product purity, and/or selectivity for ethylene trimerizations and/or tetramerizations. Using reaction ground states and transition states, and/or reaction ground states and transition states in combination with the energetic span model, this disclosure reveals that a chromium chromacycle mechanism, there are multiple ground states and multiple transition states, which can account for activity, purity, and/or selectivity for selective ethylene oligomerizations. Based on the reaction ground states and transition states, and/or reaction ground states and transition states in combination with the energetic span model, the methods disclosed herein can qualitatively and semi-quantitatively used to predict relative heteroatomic ligand-metal compound complex activity, purity, and/or selectivity and lead to a successful process for catalyst design and implementation, in which new ligands can be successfully identified and experimentally validated.