ML Change Registry Vault for Enterprise IT Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of enterprise computing environments makes it difficult and time-consuming to identify the potential direct and indirect impacts of changes, leading to unintended adverse effects on seemingly unrelated components, with IT personnel relying on intuition and having a low success rate in preventing change failures.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning techniques to evaluate the likelihood of adverse operations by analyzing change characteristics, generating an adverse operation score, and comparing it to a threshold to block or allow changes, thereby preventing unforeseen adverse effects through a change registry vault and change release evaluation engine.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manual evaluation process is used by IT personnel, then changes can be implemented with human judgment, but the success rate is low and time consumption is high due to complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange implementation success rateVSAvoidtime for evaluation process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical evaluation process with an automated machine learning system. The ML model automatically analyzes change characteristics, evaluates potential adverse effects, and predicts outcomes, substituting human judgment with algorithmic assessment. This automation resolves the contradiction by providing consistent, scalable evaluation that is both faster and more reliable than manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary machine learning system that acts as a mediator between change proposals and deployment. This intermediary automatically assesses changes by analyzing characteristics such as change type, scope, and historical data, providing an objective evaluation that complements or replaces human judgment. The intermediary resolves the time and reliability contradiction by processing evaluations consistently and efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive evaluation of all changes is performed manually, then potential adverse effects can be identified, but the complexity and time required make this impractical for enterprise scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of adverse effectsVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual evaluation with automated machine learning analysis. The system automatically processes change characteristics, historical data, and system state information to identify potential adverse effects. This substitution resolves the contradiction by providing comprehensive detection capability without the proportional increase in manual complexity and time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses machine learning models that learn from historical change data and system behavior patterns. By copying and generalizing from past experiences stored in training data, the system can evaluate new changes without manually analyzing every possible scenario. This approach provides comprehensive adverse effect detection while managing complexity through pattern recognition rather than exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If more manual review and evaluation is performed, then change failures can be prevented, but productivity and deployment speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of change failuresVSAvoiddeployment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces slow manual review processes with automated machine learning evaluation. The ML system rapidly analyzes change characteristics and predicts potential failures, providing reliable assessment without the time delays of manual processes. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high prevention capability while dramatically increasing deployment speed through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary evaluation of changes using machine learning models before deployment. The system pre-assesses change characteristics, identifies potential adverse effects, and flags high-risk changes before they reach human reviewers or production systems. This preliminary action resolves the contradiction by catching failures early in the process, reducing the need for extensive manual review while maintaining high prevention rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11049058B2System and method for improving performance in an enterprise computing environment
Publication Date: 2021.06.29 MORGAN STANLEY SERVICES GROUP INC
  • US11049058B2 patent drawing
  • US11049058B2 patent drawing
  • US11049058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for improving performance in an enterprise computing environment is disclosed and involves a change registry vault, including a machine learning model that analyzes whether or not implementation of a change will result in adverse operation of a component of the enterprise computing environment if the change is released, and takes different actions depending upon a result of that analysis. A corresponding method is also disclosed.