Machine Learning for Real-Time Clinical Decision Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in selecting optimal anti-infective therapies for treating infectious diseases is exacerbated by the emergence of resistant pathogens, requiring healthcare providers to navigate complex electronic medical record systems for real-time decision support.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize machine learning to provide real-time decision support by determining trigger events in electronic health records, obtaining patient-specific data, selecting pharmacokinetic models, and generating rankings of drug therapies based on predicted efficacy, thereby recommending optimal drug regimens.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If healthcare providers manually review electronic medical records to select optimal anti-infective therapies, then treatment decisions can be personalized to patient needs, but the time required for decision-making increases and real-time support is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment selection accuracyVSAvoiddecision-making time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service by having the computer system automatically retrieve patient data from electronic medical records, apply pharmacokinetic models, calculate probability of PK-PD target attainment, and generate ranked therapy recommendations without requiring manual clinician intervention for data collection and analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of reviewing medical records and calculating therapy effectiveness is replaced with an automated computational system that uses machine learning algorithms and pharmacokinetic modeling to rapidly analyze patient data and generate treatment recommendations in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If complex pharmacokinetic modeling is performed for each patient to determine optimal therapy, then treatment efficacy can be optimized, but the computational complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system manages complexity by focusing on specific critical parameters (patient demographics, infection characteristics, pathogen data, creatinine clearance, weight, height) and using these to drive pharmacokinetic modeling, rather than attempting to process all possible clinical variables

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary computational layer that acts as a bridge between raw patient data and clinical decision-making, using automated pharmacokinetic modeling and machine learning algorithms to translate complex medical data into actionable ranked therapy recommendations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If real-time automated recommendations are provided to clinicians, then decision-making speed improves, but the risk of algorithmic errors or inappropriate recommendations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making speedVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where clinician interactions with recommendations (acceptance, modification, or rejection) are captured and used to refine and improve the machine learning models over time, allowing the system to learn from real-world outcomes and continuously enhance recommendation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis and generates ranked therapy recommendations in advance of the clinician's final decision, providing pre-processed, evidence-based options that streamline the decision-making process while allowing clinician review and override if needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250037828A1Machine learning for real-time decision support
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 PRXCISION INC
  • US20250037828A1 patent drawing
  • US20250037828A1 patent drawing
  • US20250037828A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system, computer program product and method for determining a probability of attaining a PK-PD target associated with efficacy for a patient that includes a processor(s) determining that a trigger event related to a patient, wherein the patient record comprises an order for a current drug regimen, has occurred in an electronic health record (EHR) system communicatively coupled to the one or more processors. The processor obtains descriptive information relating to a patient. The processor selects a pharmacokinetic model. The processor applies the pharmacokinetic model and utilizes the information relating to the patient to determine, for each of the one or more drug therapies, a probability of attaining a PK-PD target associated with efficacy for the patient with the infection. The processor generates rankings for the drug therapies and determines if the current drug regimen comprises a probability above a threshold. The processor generates a new order.