ML Compressed Air Leak Detection via Shutdown Event Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Detecting leaks in compressed air systems is challenging due to the complexity of these systems, the difficulty in distinguishing between consumed and leaked air, and the invisibility of air, making conventional methods inaccurate and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using Machine Learning (ML) models trained to identify compressed air leak patterns based on pressure and flow rate data during shutdown events, allowing for the detection of leaks without the need for additional equipment or manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional leak detection methods are used, then the system can operate continuously, but the detection accuracy is low and leaks cannot be reliably distinguished from normal consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by identifying shutdown events and collecting pressure and flow rate data during these events before applying ML models. This preliminary data collection and event identification prepares the system to detect leaks more accurately when the system is actually running, rather than requiring full shutdowns for detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical/physical leak detection methods (audible means, visual inspection) with Machine Learning models that analyze pressure and flow rate data. This substitution enables automated, accurate leak detection without requiring manual intervention or system shutdowns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If full system shutdowns are performed to detect leaks, then detection accuracy improves, but production disruption and time loss increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection accuracyVSAvoidproduction downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring complete system shutdowns, the system uses partial shutdown events (where demand is at least partially reduced) combined with ML analysis of pressure and flow rate data. This partial approach maintains production continuity while still enabling accurate leak detection through the trained models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of full system shutdowns with an intelligent ML-based analysis system that can detect leaks during normal operations by analyzing pressure and flow rate patterns, eliminating the need for production stoppages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If additional detection equipment is deployed to improve leak detection, then detection capability improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system makes existing pressure and flow rate sensors serve multiple functions: both for normal system operation monitoring and for leak detection. The ML models analyze the same operational data for dual purposes, eliminating the need for separate dedicated leak detection equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own operational data (pressure and flow rate measurements already taken for system control) to perform self-diagnosis for leak detection. The ML models analyze data that the system already collects during normal operation, enabling the system to detect its own leaks without external detection equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240310233A1Machine learning based detection of compressed air leaks
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 ECOPLANT TECHCAL INNOVATION LTD
  • US20240310233A1 patent drawing
  • US20240310233A1 patent drawing
  • US20240310233A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed here is a computer implemented method of detecting leaks in a compressed air system using Machine Learning (ML), comprising identifying one or more shutdown events in a compressed air system comprising one or more compressed air clients consuming compressed air delivered by one or more air compressors, during each shutdown event demand of compressed air by the compressed air client(s) is at least partially reduced, receiving pressure data and flow rate data measured in the compressed air system during each shutdown event, and detecting one or more compressed air leaks in the compressed air system using one or more trained ML models applied to the pressure data and the flow rate data. The ML model(s) are trained to identify a plurality of compressed air leak patterns based on pressure and flow rate data.