Machine Learning Concrete Mix Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The cement and concrete industry faces challenges in optimizing concrete formulations due to limited raw materials and high carbon emissions, necessitating innovative methods for developing cost-effective, durable, and sustainable solutions.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based method that utilizes customer data, proprietary datasets, and specific machine learning techniques to optimize concrete mixtures in real-time, considering worksite context parameters, and employs historical data sets to generate and validate models for predicting optimal concrete mixing parameters, such as resistivity and compression test results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional concrete formulations are used, then construction needs are met, but carbon emissions are high and raw materials are depleted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon emissionsVSAvoidconcrete performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying concrete formulation parameters (cement content, admixture types and dosages, supplementary materials) to find optimal mixes that reduce carbon emissions while maintaining performance. The machine learning models analyze how changes in these parameters affect both environmental impact and concrete properties, enabling optimization of the trade-off between sustainability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining multiple cementitious materials (Portland cement, fly ash, slag, silica fume) and various admixtures in optimized proportions. This composite approach allows the concrete to achieve desired performance characteristics while reducing the carbon-intensive Portland cement content, thus lowering emissions without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If more raw materials are used, then concrete strength is improved, but material costs and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcrete strengthVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes to optimize material quantities by precisely controlling the proportions of each component in the concrete mix. The machine learning models identify the minimum necessary amounts of each material required to achieve target strength levels, eliminating excess material usage while maintaining or improving strength performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs computational copying by using machine learning models trained on historical data to predict optimal formulations without requiring extensive physical experimentation. The models replicate the relationship between material composition and strength outcomes, enabling virtual optimization that reduces the need for trial-and-error material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If extensive testing is performed, then formulation accuracy is improved, but time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformulation accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models on extensive historical formulation and performance data before actual concrete development. This preliminary computational work builds a knowledge base that accelerates future formulation optimization, reducing the need for extensive new testing while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where test results from laboratory trials are fed back into the machine learning models to refine and update formulation predictions. This closed-loop approach continuously improves formulation accuracy while reducing the number of iterations needed, as the system learns from each test and makes more accurate predictions subsequently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20220253734A1Machine learning methods to optimize concrete applications and formulations
Publication Date: 2022.08.11 AICRETE CORP
  • US20220253734A1 patent drawing
  • US20220253734A1 patent drawing
  • US20220253734A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprising: pulling a set of customer data and augment it with data sets designed to optimized machine learning operations; Selecting specified machine learning techniques from a specified machine learning database; taking into account a set of worksite context parameters; and optimizing and adjusting a concrete mix in real time to be able to deliver concrete products that meet requirements of project.