ML Content Categorization via Contextual Metadata Embedding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content categorization systems face challenges with scalability, accuracy, and adaptability due to manual tagging errors, static keyword meanings, and the rapid increase in content volume, leading to incorrect categorization and monetization of content in inappropriate contexts.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a system that retrieves and preprocesses content datasets, generates contextual similarities, and trains machine learning models to dynamically categorize content by embedding metadata and contextual information, allowing for adaptive and accurate categorization across large datasets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual tagging techniques are used to categorize content, then users can apply tags/keywords to categorize content, but the system is prone to error with incorrect tagging and is difficult to scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of categorizationVSAvoidtagging accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service categorization by automatically generating tags and categories using machine learning models. The ML models analyze content and autonomously generate relevant tags without requiring manual user input, thereby eliminating human error while maintaining ease of categorization at scale

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual tagging process with an automated machine learning-based system. The ML models process content and generate tags algorithmically, substituting human manual operations with automated computational processes that eliminate errors and enable scaling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If a short list of tags is provided to solve incorrect tagging, then tagging is simplified, but widely different content being tagged with the same tags/keywords

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag selection simplicityVSAvoidcategorization precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts tagging parameters based on content analysis. The ML models generate context-specific tags and adjust the granularity and specificity of tags according to the content being categorized, ensuring precise categorization while maintaining user-friendly tag selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The tagging system is dynamic and adaptive, with ML models that continuously learn from content patterns and adjust tag recommendations in real-time. This allows the system to provide simplified tag selection while maintaining high categorization precision through context-aware tag generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If custom tags or a longer list of crowd-sourced tags are offered, then more specific categorization is possible, but this can confuse a user/creator selecting from a long list of similar tags for categorizing content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategorization flexibilityVSAvoidtag selection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the ML models analyze user interactions with tags and continuously improve tag recommendations. The system learns from selection patterns and provides personalized, context-relevant tag suggestions, maintaining categorization flexibility while simplifying the selection process through intelligent filtering and ranking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If the same tags are applied to all content from a creator, then categorization is simplified, but this causes issues with wrong categorization when the content instances from the same content creator are on different topics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebulk categorization easeVSAvoidcategorization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by generating context-specific tags for each content instance rather than uniform tags for all content. The ML models analyze individual content characteristics and apply appropriate tags locally to each piece of content, ensuring accurate categorization while maintaining efficient batch processing capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Ease of operation

If predefined tags/keywords are used to categorize content, then categorization is straightforward, but additional categories cannot be applied over time for the same content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategorization simplicityVSAvoidcategory evolution capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The categorization system is dynamic and evolves over time through continuous ML model training and learning. The system adapts to new content types and trends by automatically generating new tags and categories, maintaining categorization simplicity while enabling continuous evolution of the taxonomy through automated learning from content patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

6Productivity

If traditional AI categorization systems use predefined rules and older algorithms, then categorization can be performed, but scalability and adaptability are limited and extensive time and costs are required to train the machine learning models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategorization throughputVSAvoidsystem adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional rule-based AI systems with modern machine learning models that automatically learn from data. This substitution enables the system to process content at high speed while continuously adapting to new patterns, eliminating the need for manual rule updates and extensive retraining that characterized traditional systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12164553B1Systems and methods for intelligent, scalable, and cost-effective data categorization
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 EAST WEST INT MARKETING GRP INC
  • US12164553B1 patent drawing
  • US12164553B1 patent drawing
  • US12164553B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for classification. Techniques may retrieve content datasets, gather first sets of input data from the content datasets, and preprocess the first sets of input data. Techniques may next generate second sets of input data by embedding associated first metadata and second metadata, determine a plurality of contextual similarities based on contextual information, and generate third sets of input data by grouping one or more sets of input data based on the determined plurality of contextual similarities. Techniques may further determine, for each content dataset of the plurality of content datasets using one or more machine learning models, one or more second categories associated with the content dataset.