Automated Content Moderation via ML Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional online content moderation systems relying on human moderators are time-consuming and prone to errors, struggling to keep pace with the rapid influx of user-generated content on popular websites.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a machine learning system that automatically categorizes and moderates user-generated content by processing textual content using a machine learning algorithm to calculate likelihoods of unsuitability, comparing these to threshold values, and determining whether to publish or exclude content based on predefined criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human moderators are used to moderate user-generated content, then moderation accuracy can be maintained, but the moderation process becomes time-consuming and cannot keep pace with rapid content influx

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoderation accuracyVSAvoidmoderation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated moderation system as an intermediary between users and human moderators. This system uses machine learning algorithms to pre-screen and categorize user-generated content, filtering out obvious violations before human review. This intermediary layer handles the high-volume routine work, allowing human moderators to focus on complex cases that require judgment, thus maintaining accuracy while dramatically increasing throughput capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The moderation process is segmented into multiple stages: automated preliminary screening, categorization by violation type, and selective human review. By dividing the monolithic moderation task into discrete segments handled by different components (automated systems for clear-cut cases, human moderators for ambiguous cases), the system achieves both high-speed processing of routine content and accurate judgment for complex content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If more human moderators are hired to handle increased content volume, then moderation capacity increases, but costs and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoderation capacityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service moderation through automated algorithms that independently screen, categorize, and flag content without human intervention for routine violations. This self-service capability handles the majority of moderation tasks, eliminating the need to proportionally increase human moderator headcount as content volume grows, thus avoiding the operational complexity of managing larger moderation teams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human moderators with an automated computer-based moderation system using machine learning and natural language processing. This substitution transforms moderation from a labor-intensive manual process to an automated computational process, dramatically increasing capacity while reducing operational complexity related to human resource management, training, and coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated moderation systems are implemented, then processing speed increases, but accuracy and reliability may decrease due to inability to understand nuanced content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmoderation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The moderation system is segmented into automated and human components, with each handling appropriate cases. Automated systems handle clear-cut violations with high speed, while human moderators handle nuanced cases requiring understanding of context, sarcasm, and cultural references. This segmentation ensures that speed is maximized where appropriate while reliability is maintained through human judgment for complex cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where automated moderation decisions are continuously evaluated and used to retrain and improve the algorithms. Human moderator corrections of automated decisions provide labeled training data that refines the system's understanding of nuanced content over time. This feedback mechanism allows the automated system to progressively improve its reliability while maintaining high processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11550837B2Systems and methods for categorizing and moderating user-generated content in an online environment
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US11550837B2 patent drawing
  • US11550837B2 patent drawing
  • US11550837B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments provide systems, devices and methods for computer-based categorization and moderation of user-generated content for publication of the content in an online environment. Exemplary embodiments determine a likelihood that the user-generated content falls into a first selected category unsuitable for publication. The likelihood is compared to a first set of threshold values and then, in this embodiment, it is determined whether to electronically publish the content in the online environment based on the comparison.