Machine Learning Currency Routing and Carrier Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current currency transportation services lack optimization in route planning and carrier assignment, failing to adequately meet the specific requirements of retail locations, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using machine-learning based modeling to identify and assign optimal carriers and financial institution locations for currency transportation, considering location-specific requirements, historical data, and predicted future demands to minimize costs and ensure compliance with regulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If carriers combine trips to multiple retail locations into a single route to save costs, then transportation costs are reduced, but carriers lack adequate visibility into retailer requirements leading to inability to optimize routes while maintaining compliance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation costVSAvoidroute optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A centralized computing system acts as an intermediary between carriers and retail locations, collecting location-specific requirements data and using machine learning models to generate optimized routes that satisfy all constraints. This mediator enables complex optimization without burdening individual carriers with the computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary data collection and analysis by gathering location-specific requirements, historical data, and carrier capabilities before route optimization. Machine learning models pre-process this data to predict optimal routes, enabling carriers to execute optimized routes without real-time decision-making complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If automated optimization systems are implemented to meet specific retailer requirements, then service quality and compliance improve, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with retailer requirementsVSAvoidautomated system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where location-specific requirements data, historical transportation data, and compliance outcomes are continuously collected and fed into machine learning models. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from past performance and improve route optimization while maintaining compliance, reducing the need for manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts optimization parameters based on location-specific requirements, such as time windows, carrier preferences, and compliance constraints. By changing parameters rather than system architecture, the system adapts to different retailer needs without increasing fundamental complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If machine learning models are used to automatically assign carriers and destinations, then transportation efficiency and cost optimization improve, but data processing requirements and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system is segmented into distributed components that process data locally at retail locations and carrier endpoints, with a centralized model handling aggregate optimization. This segmentation reduces the computational burden on any single system while maintaining overall efficiency through coordinated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11587002B1Systems and methods for automated carrier routing including destination and carrier selection
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 G4S RETAIL SOLUTIONS USA INC
  • US11587002B1 patent drawing
  • US11587002B1 patent drawing
  • US11587002B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In response to a request for currency transportation services for a retail location (e.g., providing currency to the retail location or picking-up currency from the retail location), one or more currency transportation requirements are identified and provided as input to a currency transportation model to identify and/or assign a carrier and/or a financial institution location to serve as a final destination or an origin for the currency transportation services. The output of the currency transportation model is utilized to initiate the currency transportation services by transmitting a notification to a carrier-operated computing entity to schedule the requested currency transportation services.