Machine Learning Dangerous Goods Classification via Text Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual classification of dangerous goods is labor-intensive, costly, and prone to errors due to the limited number of expert professionals required to understand and apply complex regulations across various jurisdictions, which can lead to safety risks and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A fully automated system using a machine learning algorithm, such as a deep learning neural network, that predicts whether a product is a dangerous good and estimates its risks by converting product attributes into a single string value for classification across multiple regulations, assisting experts and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual classification by human experts is used, then classification accuracy can be maintained through expert knowledge, but the process becomes labor-intensive and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidclassification efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical classification process performed by human experts with an automated machine learning system. The system uses trained models to analyze product data and determine dangerous goods classifications, substituting human cognitive work with computational algorithms that can process multiple products simultaneously without additional labor costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The classification system enables products to be classified automatically through self-service mechanisms. The machine learning models are trained once on comprehensive regulatory data and then autonomously perform classifications without requiring ongoing human intervention for each product, allowing the system to serve itself in making classification decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If more expert professionals are hired to handle increased volume, then classification accuracy is maintained, but costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidnumber of experts required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system creates a universal classification tool that can handle all dangerous goods classification tasks across different jurisdictions and product types. A single automated system performs the work that would otherwise require multiple specialized experts with different jurisdictional knowledge, making the classification capability universally applicable without proportionally increasing expert staff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of expert knowledge in the form of trained machine learning models. These model copies encapsulate regulatory expertise and can be replicated and deployed across multiple systems simultaneously, eliminating the need to multiply actual human experts while preserving their classification capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If experts review all products manually, then thorough classification is achieved, but time consumption increases for non-dangerous products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification thoroughnessVSAvoidtime spent on non-dangerous products
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by using the machine learning model to perform initial classifications for all products. For products that the model confidently identifies as non-dangerous, no further manual review is performed. Manual expert review is reserved only for products that require excessive action - those with borderline cases or high-risk characteristics - thereby reducing time loss on clearly safe products while maintaining thoroughness where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The classification process is segmented into two stages: automated machine learning classification for initial screening, followed by selective manual expert review only for products that require further analysis. This segmentation separates the bulk processing of clear cases from the detailed analysis of complex cases, reducing overall time consumption while maintaining classification thoroughness for products that need it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual classification processes are used, then flexibility in handling complex regulations is maintained, but errors can still occur due to human limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation interpretation flexibilityVSAvoidclassification error rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models on comprehensive regulatory datasets from multiple jurisdictions before deployment. This preliminary training embeds regulatory knowledge and interpretation flexibility into the model structure, allowing the system to adapt to complex regulations without requiring real-time human judgment for each classification decision, thereby reducing error rates while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12125075B2Classification of dangerous goods via machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 SAP SE
  • US12125075B2 patent drawing
  • US12125075B2 patent drawing
  • US12125075B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a system and method that can identify whether an item is a dangerous good. The system can determine whether a product belongs in any of a number of different classes of dangerous goods from among a plurality of different regulations based on a machine learning algorithm which performs a text-based classification. In one example, the method may include receiving an identification of an object, retrieving a plurality of descriptive attributes of the object from a data store and converting the plurality of descriptive attributes into an input string, predicting whether the object is a dangerous object via execution of a text-based machine learning algorithm that receives the input string as an input, and outputting information about the prediction of the object for display via a user interface.