ML-Based Unstructured Data Anonymization for PII Disclosure Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to effectively anonymize unstructured data due to the inability to detect and assess the risk of personally identifiable information (PII), leading to potential disclosure uncertainties and compliance issues.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine-learning models to detect PII in unstructured data, simulate undetected PII, and apply transformations or resyntheses to mitigate disclosure risks, ensuring compliance through auditable proof of efficacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine-learning models are used to detect PII in unstructured data, then detection accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by simulating undetected PII before final risk assessment. This allows the model to account for potential missed detections in advance, improving overall detection accuracy without requiring exponentially more computational resources during the main processing phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary simulation component that generates hypothetical undetected PII instances. This intermediary layer bridges the gap between detected and undetected PII, allowing the risk assessment model to evaluate disclosure risk more comprehensively without directly analyzing every possible undetected attribute.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If simulation of undetected PII is performed, then risk assessment completeness is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by simulating only a representative subset of undetected PII rather than exhaustively generating all possible undetected instances. This simulation approach provides sufficient risk assessment completeness while avoiding excessive processing time that would result from complete enumeration of all potential undetected attributes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If transformations are applied to mitigate disclosure risk, then data privacy protection is improved, but data utility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisclosure riskVSAvoiddata utility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by performing targeted transformations only on specific detected PII attributes that pose disclosure risks, rather than uniformly transforming all data. This selective approach protects privacy where needed while preserving data utility in non-sensitive areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes by applying different transformation techniques (such as generalization, suppression, or perturbation) to different PII attributes based on their specific risk characteristics. This allows optimization of the balance between privacy protection and data utility for each attribute type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive risk assessment is performed on all attributes, then disclosure risk measurement is improved, but computational resources are excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk measurement accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses computational resources on assessing risk for detected PII attributes and representative simulated undetected attributes, rather than uniformly processing all attributes. This extraction of critical assessment targets maintains measurement precision while reducing overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20260037670A1Machine learning for data anonymization
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 PRIVACY ANALYTICS
  • US20260037670A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037670A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037670A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for anonymizing unstructured data. In some implementations, a server can receive unstructured data. The server can automatically detect attributes in the unstructured data using a trained machine-learning model and can determine an amount of undetected attributes and detected attributes in the unstructured data. The server can simulate additional attributes for the unstructured data according to the amount of undetected attributes. The server can analyze a risk of disclosure in the unstructured data using the detected attributes and the simulated additional attributes. The server can modify the detected attributes according to the analyzed risk of disclosure and replace the detected attributes with the modified detected attributes in the unstructured data.