ML Decision Engine Combining Historical, Experimental, and Simulation Insights

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual decision-making in organizations is prone to individual biases, errors, and inefficiencies, particularly when dealing with large volumes of data or complex scenarios, leading to inconsistent and suboptimal outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based computing system that includes subsystems for data analysis, insight generation, synthesis, and decision-making, utilizing both machine learning models and simulation-based models to generate and optimize decisions based on historical and real-time data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual decision-making is used in organizations, then human judgement and flexibility are maintained, but individual biases, errors, and inconsistencies occur leading to suboptimal outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision consistencyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human decision-making processes with an automated machine learning-based computing system. The system uses trained ML models to analyze data and generate decisions, substituting human cognitive processes with computational algorithms that eliminate biases, errors, and inconsistencies while maintaining reliability across all decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The computing system is designed to autonomously make decisions without requiring continuous human intervention. The ML models self-service by automatically processing input data, generating decisions, and providing outputs, thereby maintaining consistent and reliable decision-making while reducing dependence on human judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual decision-making is used, then human judgement is applied, but processing capacity is limited when dealing with large volumes of data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human data processing with automated machine learning models that can handle large volumes of data efficiently. The computing system processes vast datasets without the cognitive limitations of human decision-makers, significantly increasing productivity while the modular architecture manages system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The computing system is divided into distinct modules including data reception, preprocessing, ML model processing, and output generation. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific tasks efficiently, increasing overall data processing capacity while keeping individual module complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If manual decision-making is used, then human expertise is leveraged, but timeliness and accessibility of information are delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing data and having trained ML models ready to generate decisions immediately when input data is received. This eliminates delays associated with manual data gathering and analysis, significantly reducing decision time while the automated preprocessing manages complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual information gathering and processing with automated computational processes. The system instantly accesses and processes relevant information without human delays, reducing decision time while the structured automated approach manages system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual decision-making is used, then human judgement is applied, but scalability is limited when organizational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing system is designed with universal ML models that can handle multiple types of decisions across different organizational contexts. The same system architecture scales from small to large organizations, adapting to increasing complexity through configurable parameters rather than requiring fundamentally different systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts to organizational complexity by adjusting processing depth, model selection, and data requirements based on the specific decision context. This dynamic behavior allows the system to scale efficiently as organizational complexity increases without requiring proportional increases in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260080302A1Machine learning based computing system and method for generating decisions corresponding to processes in organizations
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 EXAFLUENCE INC USA
  • US20260080302A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080302A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080302A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine learning based computing system for generating decisions corresponding to processes in organizations. The ML-based computing system is configured to: receive data associated with experiments, from electronic devices associated with users; analyze first data associated with first experiments, second data associated with second experiments, and third data associated with third experiments; generate second insights associated with second experiments, based on the analyzed second data associated with the second experiments by ML models; generate third insights associated with the third experiments, based on analyzed third data associated with the third experiments by simulation based models; synthesize first insights retrieved from historical data, the second insights generated from the second experiments by the ML models, and the third insights generated from the third experiments by the simulation based models; generate the decisions based on synthesization of first, second insights, and third insights; provide an output of decisions to user interfaces.