Machine Learning Drilling Parameter Analysis for Elastic Properties

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional drilling methods are inefficient due to suboptimal drilling program designs and crew mistakes, leading to increased rig time, costs, and drilling incidents, as they fail to effectively determine the elastic properties of geological formations in real-time.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that extracts feature vectors from drilling parameters, logging while drilling logs, and bit vibrations to classify the drilling environment and select appropriate regression algorithms for predicting elastic properties of geological formations, enabling real-time graphical representation and optimization of the drilling process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional drilling methods are used, then drilling operations can be performed with simple equipment, but drilling efficiency is reduced and costs increase due to inability to determine elastic properties in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical drilling optimization methods with a machine learning-based computational system. The system uses neural networks to process drilling parameters (weight on bit, rotary speed, pump rate, vibrations) and automatically determine elastic properties of geological formations, substituting complex mechanical trial-and-error approaches with intelligent algorithms that improve drilling efficiency while managing system complexity through software-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If direct measurements of elastic properties are taken, then accurate formation characterization is achieved, but drilling costs and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelastic properties characterization accuracyVSAvoiddrilling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses drilling parameters (weight on bit, rotary speed, pump rate, bit vibrations) as intermediary measurements that can be obtained during normal drilling operations without stopping. These intermediate measurements are fed into machine learning models to indirectly determine elastic properties, serving as a mediator between easily measurable drilling conditions and the desired formation characteristics, thereby achieving accurate characterization without direct formation testing that would consume time and resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual model or copy of the formation's elastic properties by training neural networks on drilling parameter data. Instead of directly measuring formation properties, the system generates a computational replica that predicts elastic moduli based on patterns learned from drilling vibrations and operational parameters, enabling accurate formation characterization as a digital copy without physical formation testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple machine learning algorithms are evaluated, then the most suitable algorithm is selected for specific drilling conditions, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm selection for different drilling environmentsVSAvoidalgorithm selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the drilling environment into distinct categories (e.g., hard rock, soft rock, variable conditions) and assigns specific machine learning algorithms to each segment. By dividing the complex problem of algorithm selection into manageable segments based on drilling conditions, the system achieves adaptability across different geological formations while keeping the overall system complexity controlled through modular algorithm deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11781416B2Determination of elastic properties of a geological formation using machine learning applied to data acquired while drilling
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US11781416B2 patent drawing
  • US11781416B2 patent drawing
  • US11781416B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for determination of elastic properties of geological formations using machine learning include extracting a first feature vector from data acquired during drilling. The data includes at least drilling parameters. The first feature vector is indicative of a drilling environment classification. A machine learning classification algorithm determines the drilling environment classification based on the first feature vector. A machine learning regression algorithm is selected from multiple machine learning regression algorithms based on the drilling classification. A second feature vector is extracted from the data acquired during drilling based on the drilling classification and the selected machine learning regression algorithm. The second feature vector is indicative of elastic properties of a geological formation. The selected machine learning regression algorithm determines the elastic properties of the geological formation based on the second feature vector.