Machine Learning Drilling Parameter Prediction System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Oil and gas well drilling operations are costly and prone to significant non-productive time, often resulting in injuries, environmental damage, and production losses due to incidents like differential sticking, wellbore geometry issues, and hole cleaning problems, which current technologies fail to predict effectively.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that receives real-time data from sensors, filters and normalizes it, and uses predictive models to forecast events such as differential sticking, wellbore geometry issues, and hole cleaning problems, comparing predictions with trigger thresholds to issue warnings and prevent operational failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring methods are used in drilling operations, then operational costs are incurred, but non-productive time increases and incidents occur due to inability to predict operational failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidnon-productive time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by continuously monitoring drilling parameters and using machine learning models to predict future operational conditions. This allows the system to issue warnings before actual incidents occur, enabling proactive intervention rather than reactive response, thereby reducing non-productive time caused by unexpected failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where predicted values are continuously compared against trigger thresholds, and warnings are generated when thresholds are approached. This feedback loop enables real-time adjustments to drilling operations, improving reliability by preventing incidents before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time data processing and machine learning prediction are implemented, then operational reliability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident prediction capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary machine learning model that processes complex drilling data and translates it into simple, actionable predictions. This intermediary layer handles the computational complexity internally while presenting simplified outputs to operators, thereby improving incident prediction capability without proportionally increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical monitoring approaches with data-driven machine learning models. Instead of relying on complex physical sensors and mechanical systems to detect every potential failure mode, the system uses algorithms to analyze patterns in existing operational data, achieving improved reliability through software-based prediction rather than hardware complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12180822B2System and method to predict value and timing of drilling operational parameters
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 EXEBENUS AS
  • US12180822B2 patent drawing
  • US12180822B2 patent drawing
  • US12180822B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system for using machine learning technologies to predict the value and timing of operational parameters. These predictions are then used to identify the risk of certain well incidents to occur, and if so notify responsible personnel thereof as to allow preventive actions to be taken.