ML-Based Drive Test Prioritization for 5G Coverage Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional drive testing methods for 5G networks are cumbersome and resource-intensive, requiring tedious trial-and-error approaches to ensure network coverage meets performance requirements, straining computational, communication, and human resources.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a trained machine learning model that integrates estimated radio frequency measurements with past drive test data to prioritize drive tests, determining execution priorities based on predicted success rates and geographic data, and adjusting network configurations as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional trial-and-error drive testing is performed to ensure network coverage meets performance requirements, then network coverage quality is improved, but resource consumption (computational, communication, hardware, and human resources) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverage qualityVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by training a machine learning model on historical drive test data and using it to predict outcomes of candidate drive tests before execution. This allows prioritization of high-value tests and avoidance of low-value ones, reducing actual resource consumption while maintaining coverage quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses automatically collected historical drive test data and estimated RF measurements to train the machine learning model, which then autonomously prioritizes future drive tests. This self-service approach eliminates manual trial-and-error planning and reduces human resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive drive testing is performed across all network areas, then measurement completeness is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement completenessVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively executing only the most valuable drive tests based on machine learning predictions. Instead of performing exhaustive testing across all areas, it focuses resources on tests with highest predicted success rates and information value, achieving adequate measurement completeness with reduced time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses historical drive test results as feedback to train the machine learning model, which then predicts outcomes of candidate tests. This feedback loop enables intelligent prioritization that maintains measurement completeness by focusing on areas most likely to provide valuable information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If machine learning based prioritization is implemented, then resource efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model serves multiple functions: it predicts drive test outcomes, prioritizes test sequences, and implicitly identifies high-value measurement areas. This multi-functionality justifies the added system complexity by delivering comprehensive resource efficiency improvements across the entire drive testing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12556951B2Machine learning based network drive test prioritization
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 DISH WIRELESS LLC
  • US12556951B2 patent drawing
  • US12556951B2 patent drawing
  • US12556951B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies for network drive test prioritization based on machine learning are disclosed. An example method includes feeding a representation of routes of a target candidate drive test to a trained machine learning model to obtain a drive test prediction, wherein the trained machine learning model is trained based on integrating radio frequency (RF) estimations or predictions with past drive test data. The method also includes sorting a set of candidate drive tests for the communications network including the target candidate drive test, based on drive test predictions associated with each candidate drive test, to determine priorities for executing drive tests; and determining expectation of network usability in accordance with network availability and performance metrics.