Machine Learning Dynamic Resource Reordering Points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In dynamic environments where customer needs and supply lead times are constantly changing, existing methods struggle to optimize inventory levels without making costly decisions that either drive up costs or compromise customer experience, due to outdated data and lengthy manual processes.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that identifies dynamic resource reordering points by analyzing historical and current data, including resource availability, consumption, and reordering data, to automatically calculate and update reorder points, ensuring timely resource allocation while maintaining desired customer service levels and cost structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual analysis and decision-making processes are used to determine inventory reorder points, then decisions can be made with human judgment and flexibility, but the process takes too long and data becomes obsolete by the time decisions are made

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata freshnessVSAvoiddecision time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis processes with automated machine learning systems. The ML engine continuously processes resource availability, consumption, and reordering data without human intervention, eliminating the time lag between data collection and decision-making while maintaining or improving judgment quality through algorithmic pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automated ML-based reorder point determination. The machine learning engine autonomously analyzes historical and current data, predicts future resource needs, and generates reorder recommendations without requiring manual analysis, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating delays associated with human decision cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If inventory levels are increased to ensure resource availability, then customer service levels improve, but costs and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource availabilityVSAvoidinventory level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically changes inventory parameters based on ML predictions. Instead of maintaining static safety stock levels, the system adjusts reorder points and inventory targets in real-time based on predicted resource consumption patterns, demand variability, and lead times, optimizing the balance between availability and inventory quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static inventory planning to dynamic inventory management. The machine learning engine continuously updates reorder points and resource availability forecasts based on current data, enabling the inventory system to adapt dynamically to changing conditions rather than relying on fixed thresholds and periodic reviews.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If manual steps, approvals, and handoffs are used in the resource reordering process, then control and oversight are maintained, but delivery lead times become very long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess controlVSAvoiddelivery lead time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual operational processes with automated machine learning systems. The ML engine handles data analysis, prediction, and reorder recommendation generation automatically, eliminating multiple manual steps, approvals, and handoffs while maintaining control through systematic algorithmic decision-making and configurable thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Force

If traditional forecasting methods are used in push environments, then production planning can be done in advance, but delivery lead times are extended due to manual processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction planning capabilityVSAvoiddelivery lead time
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical forecasting methods with machine learning-based predictive systems. The ML engine processes historical and real-time data to generate accurate demand forecasts and reorder recommendations automatically, maintaining advance production planning capability while eliminating the time losses associated with manual forecasting and approval processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240020630A1Systems and methods for machine learning-based identification of dynamic resource reordering points
Publication Date: 2024.01.18 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US20240020630A1 patent drawing
  • US20240020630A1 patent drawing
  • US20240020630A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for machine learning-based identification of dynamic resource reordering points are disclosed. In one embodiment, a method may include a resource management computer program executed on an electronic device: (1) receiving historical resource availability data, historical resource consumption data, and historical resource reordering data for a resource; (2) training a machine learning engine to predict dynamic resource reordering points for the resource using the historical resource availability data, the historical resource consumption data, and the historical resource reordering data; (3) receiving current resource availability data, current resource demand data, and current resource reordering data for the resource; (4) predicting a dynamic resource reordering point for the resource based on the current resource availability data, the current resource demand data, and/or the current resource reordering data; and (5) requesting additional resources in response to threshold for the dynamic resource reordering point being met.