Machine Learning Earpiece Acoustic Mass Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the optimal acoustic mass of earpieces struggle with complexity and accuracy, often leading to user rejection due to issues like feedback, occlusion effect, and performance degradation, particularly when considering asymmetric hearing losses.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning algorithm, specifically an artificial neuronal network, is trained using user audiograms and additional data to predict the optimal acoustic mass of earpieces, simplifying the selection process and improving accuracy by considering user-specific factors such as hearing asymmetry and experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If rule-based algorithms are used to determine optimal acoustic mass, then a balance between rejection metrics can be achieved, but the algorithm complexity becomes high and accuracy is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of acoustic mass determinationVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex rule-based algorithms with a machine learning model that has been trained on user data and acoustic mass parameters. This substitution transforms the deterministic, complexity-heavy rule-based system into a data-driven model that achieves higher accuracy without requiring complex real-time calculations, thereby resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If rule-based algorithms consider only a subset of user characteristics, then algorithm complexity is reduced, but user acceptance decreases due to asymmetric hearing loss not being addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsideration of user characteristicsVSAvoiduser acceptance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the input parameters of the determination system by incorporating multiple user characteristics including monaural hearing loss, asymmetry metrics, and experience levels into the machine learning model. This comprehensive parameter set allows the system to adapt to individual user needs, particularly addressing asymmetric hearing loss, thereby improving user acceptance and reliability without increasing algorithmic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional methods determine acoustic mass, then manufacturing processes remain simple, but precision of acoustic mass determination is insufficient leading to feedback and occlusion effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of acoustic mass determinationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by training the machine learning model in advance with comprehensive user data and acoustic mass relationships. This pre-trained model can then quickly determine optimal acoustic mass values during the fitting process, achieving high manufacturing precision without adding complexity to the actual manufacturing process. The complex work is done beforehand during model training, not during production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4576824A1Determining acoustic mass of earpiece with machine learning algorithm
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 SONOVA AG
  • EP4576824A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4576824A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4576824A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method for determining an acoustic mass (26) of an earpiece (14) to be plugged into an ear of a user comprises: receiving user data (22) comprising at least an audiogram of the user; and inputting the user data (22) into a machine learning algorithm (24) and determining the acoustic mass (26) by the machine learning algorithm (24).