ML Engine for Contract Attribute Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in predicting the time and effort required to establish complex contracts and assessing the likelihood of contract performance due to unclear contract characteristics, such as parties, political conditions, and geographic locale, which hinders effective mitigation planning.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning engine is employed to analyze documents, determine attributes, and train models to predict attribute values, ranking candidate models based on accuracy scores to improve efficiency and accuracy in contract analysis and prediction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual analysis of contract characteristics is used, then organizations can review contract details, but it requires significant time and effort to predict contract performance and establishment time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidtime and effort required
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis of contract characteristics with an automated machine learning system. The ML engine processes contract documents, extracts attributes, and generates predictions automatically, eliminating the need for human reviewers to manually analyze each contract's parties, political conditions, geographic locale, and other characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables contracts to be analyzed and evaluated autonomously without human intervention. The ML models self-service by automatically ingesting contract data, determining attributes, generating predictions about establishment time and performance likelihood, and providing results without requiring manual effort from organization personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive contract characteristics are analyzed, then prediction accuracy improves, but the complexity of the analysis system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontract performance predictionVSAvoidanalysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex analysis task into distinct components: document ingestion, attribute determination, model selection, and prediction generation. The system divides contract characteristics into separate attributes (parties, political conditions, geographic locale, subject matter, value/cost) that can be processed independently by specialized ML models, making the overall system more manageable despite comprehensive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ML engine serves multiple functions within a single system: it ingests various contract types, determines diverse attributes, selects appropriate models based on contract characteristics, and generates multiple predictions (establishment time, performance likelihood, outlier detection). This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into a universal platform rather than requiring separate systems for each analysis task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If multiple contract attributes are evaluated, then mitigation planning improves, but the effort to establish contracts increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemitigation planningVSAvoidcontract establishment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of contract characteristics and generates predictions about potential risks and establishment timelines before contracts are fully established. By evaluating attributes like political conditions, geographic locale, and subject matter in advance, the system enables organizations to plan mitigations proactively rather than reactively, improving reliability without adding post-establishment effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to organizations about contract characteristics that may impact performance or establishment time. By analyzing multiple attributes and comparing them against learned patterns from training data, the system generates actionable insights that help organizations make informed decisions during contract establishment, improving mitigation planning while maintaining efficiency through automated rather than manual evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12020130B2Automated training and selection of models for document analysis
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 ICERTIS INC
  • US12020130B2 patent drawing
  • US12020130B2 patent drawing
  • US12020130B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are directed to a machine learning engine that determines training documents and validation documents from a plurality of documents. The machine learning engine may determine attributes associated with the documents. In response to receiving a request to predict attribute values of a selected document the machine learning engine may train a plurality of ML models to predict the attribute values based on the training documents and the attributes and associate the trained ML models with an accuracy score. The machine learning engine may determine candidate ML models from the trained ML models based on the training accuracy scores. The machine learning engine may evaluate and rank the candidate ML models based on the request and the validation documents. The machine learning engine may generate confirmed ML models based on the ranked candidate ML models such that the confirmed ML models may answer the request.