ML Ensemble Drift Detection and Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current digital fraud and abuse detection technologies lack accuracy and real-time response capabilities, failing to effectively detect new threats and automatically evolve to counter evolving digital threats.

Innovation Solution

A method for accelerated anomaly detection and replacement of machine learning-based ensembles, which identifies anomalous behavior, evaluates contributing models and features, generates a successor ensemble through intelligent simulations, and replaces the existing ensemble to mitigate drift behavior, ensuring continuous threat scoring accuracy and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing technology implementations are used for digital fraud detection, then basic detection functionality is provided, but detection accuracy and real-time response capability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidreal-time response capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fraud detection process into multiple specialized machine learning models that operate in parallel, each handling specific aspects of threat detection. This segmentation enables real-time processing while maintaining high accuracy through specialized model expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters of machine learning models based on detected drift behavior, adjusting model configurations and retraining priorities to maintain optimal detection accuracy and response time as threats evolve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If machine learning models are used for threat detection, then detection capabilities are provided, but models fail to automatically adapt to new and evolving threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to detect new threatsVSAvoidautomatic evolution capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where machine learning models automatically detect their own performance degradation, trigger retraining processes, and adapt to new threats without human intervention. The system monitors itself and autonomously evolves to counter emerging digital threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops that monitor model performance, detect drift behavior, and automatically initiate retraining or model replacement. This feedback mechanism enables automatic adaptation to evolving threats while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If machine learning-based ensembles are deployed for threat scoring, then comprehensive threat analysis is achieved, but anomalous drift behavior reduces scoring accuracy over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat scoring accuracyVSAvoidensemble stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static machine learning ensembles to dynamic systems that continuously monitor for drift behavior and automatically adapt. When anomalous drift is detected, the system dynamically replaces affected models to maintain scoring accuracy while preserving ensemble stability through controlled evolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from performance monitoring to detect drift behavior in ensemble models. When drift is detected, the feedback triggers automatic model replacement processes that restore scoring accuracy while maintaining overall ensemble stability through systematic updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11841941B2Systems and methods for accelerated detection and replacement of anomalous machine learning-based ensembles and intelligent generation of anomalous artifacts for anomalous ensembles
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 SIFT SCIENCE INC
  • US11841941B2 patent drawing
  • US11841941B2 patent drawing
  • US11841941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for accelerated anomaly detection and replacement of an anomaly-experiencing machine learning-based ensemble includes identifying a machine learning-based digital threat scoring ensemble having an anomalous drift behavior in digital threat score inferences computed by the machine learning-based digital threat scoring ensemble for a target period; executing a tiered anomaly evaluation for the machine learning-based digital threat scoring ensemble that includes identifying at least one errant machine learning-based model of the machine learning-based digital threat scoring ensemble contributing to the anomalous drift behavior, and identifying at least one errant feature variable of the at least one machine learning-based model contributing to the anomalous drift behavior; generating a successor machine learning-based digital threat scoring ensemble to the machine learning-based digital threat scoring ensemble based on the tiered anomaly evaluation; and replacing the machine learning-based digital threat scoring ensemble with the successor machine learning-based digital threat scoring ensemble.