ML-Based Ergonomic Seat Design via Posture Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional seat components often fail to adequately address posture issues, medical conditions, and individual preferences for ergonomic support, particularly at specific pressure points, leading to discomfort and inadequate functionality.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a machine learning knowledge model to analyze client-specific posture data and sensor information, constructing ergonomic support design elements tailored to individual needs, and iteratively refining these designs based on ergonomic sensor data and medical evaluations to enhance comfort and functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional seat components are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but ergonomic support adequacy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic support adequacyVSAvoidseat component complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seat component is divided into multiple independent ergonomic support elements (lumbar support, armrests, headrest, cushion) that can be individually adjusted and customized. Each element addresses specific body regions separately, allowing precise ergonomic optimization without requiring complete redesign of the entire seat.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The seat component incorporates adjustable and adaptable features including movable lumbar support, reconfigurable armrests, and customizable cushioning. These dynamic elements can be modified based on individual user needs and preferences, enhancing ergonomic adequacy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If generic seat components are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to individual preferences deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual preference adaptabilityVSAvoidcustomization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system includes pre-configured ergonomic support elements and adjustment mechanisms that are prepared in advance for various user types. Standard ergonomic profiles and preset configurations are established beforehand, allowing rapid adaptation to individual preferences without requiring complex real-time customization for each user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The seat component allows modification of multiple parameters including firmness, support position, armrest height and angle, and cushion density. These parameter changes enable fine-tuned adaptation to individual user preferences while using standardized adjustment mechanisms that control the complexity of the customization system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If detailed ergonomic analysis is performed, then ergonomic support precision is improved, but analysis time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic support precisionVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensor feedback mechanisms that automatically detect user posture, weight distribution, and pressure points. This real-time feedback enables precise ergonomic analysis without manual assessment, as the sensors continuously monitor and provide data on user interaction with the seat, allowing quick and accurate customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The seat component includes self-adjusting features that automatically configure ergonomic support based on detected user characteristics and preferences. The system performs detailed ergonomic analysis autonomously through integrated sensors and algorithms, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual assessment while maintaining high precision in ergonomic support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11580443B2Facilitating client ergonomic support via machine learning
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 KYNDRYL INC
  • US11580443B2 patent drawing
  • US11580443B2 patent drawing
  • US11580443B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described with respect to facilitating client ergonomic support. An associated method includes receiving a plurality of posture datapoints associated with multiple clients and constructing a machine learning knowledge model based upon the plurality of posture datapoints in order to identify a plurality of predefined ergonomic support design elements. The method further includes receiving client-specific posture datapoints associated with a first client and analyzing, via the machine learning knowledge model, the client-specific posture datapoints in view of the plurality of posture datapoints in order to select an initial ergonomic support design element among the plurality of predefined ergonomic support design elements. The method further includes facilitate printing of the initial ergonomic support design element for a seat component associated with the first client. In an embodiment, the method further includes providing at least one ergonomic refinement to the first client based upon ergonomic sensor data.