Machine Learning Error Prediction for Data Center Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data centers face significant challenges in predicting and preventing errors in processing units like GPUs, CPUs, and DPUs, leading to resource loss, downtime, and performance degradation due to hardware, software, and user application-related issues, which can cause ripple effects across the entire data center.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of machine learning models trained on telemetry data to predict errors and anomalies in data center devices, allowing for preemptive maintenance and actions to be taken before failures occur, thereby reducing downtime and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring and reactive repair methods are used, then hardware and software failures are eventually addressed, but downtime and resource loss increase due to delayed detection and response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata center operation reliabilityVSAvoidnode downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by using machine learning models to predict errors before they occur. The system analyzes historical telemetry data and operational patterns to identify nodes at risk of failure, enabling proactive maintenance scheduling. This allows the data center to perform repairs during planned maintenance windows rather than experiencing unexpected downtime when failures occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms by continuously collecting telemetry data from data center nodes and feeding it into machine learning models. The models generate predictions about future failures, which are then used to adjust maintenance schedules and resource allocation. This closed-loop feedback system enables dynamic optimization of reliability while minimizing downtime through data-driven decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If frequent monitoring and manual inspection are performed, then errors are detected earlier, but operational complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual monitoring and inspection mechanisms with automated machine learning-based prediction systems. Instead of relying on human operators to analyze telemetry data and identify potential failures, the system uses trained models that automatically process large volumes of operational data. This substitution maintains high measurement precision for error detection while significantly reducing operational complexity and human resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the monitoring system to autonomously analyze telemetry data and generate failure predictions without requiring continuous human intervention. The machine learning models automatically process incoming data streams, update their predictions, and alert operators only when significant risks are identified. This self-serve approach maintains high detection accuracy while minimizing the complexity of manual monitoring processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If reactive repair after failure is performed, then resource loss occurs due to downtime, but preventive maintenance increases operational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata center throughputVSAvoidmaintenance management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by scheduling maintenance activities based on predicted failure risks rather than reacting to actual failures. The machine learning models identify nodes that are likely to fail soon, allowing operators to plan and execute maintenance during scheduled maintenance windows. This approach maintains high productivity by avoiding unexpected downtime while managing maintenance complexity through proactive, data-driven scheduling rather than ad-hoc reactive repairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive telemetry data collection is implemented, then prediction accuracy improves, but data processing requirements and system resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively collecting and processing only the most relevant telemetry data features for error prediction. Rather than analyzing every available data point, the machine learning models are trained to identify and process key predictive features such as temperature trends, error rates, and operational patterns. This selective approach maintains high prediction accuracy while significantly reducing data processing requirements and energy consumption compared to comprehensive analysis of all available data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240394130A1Automatic error prediction in data centers
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20240394130A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394130A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394130A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, and techniques to predict a probability of an error or anomay in processing units, such as those of a data center. In at least one embodiment, the probability of an error occuring in a proccessing unit is identified using multiple trained machine learning models, in which the trained machine learning models each outputs, for example, the probability of an error occuring within a different predetermined time period.