Machine-Learning Field Mapping for Dynamic Web Submissions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic submission methods do not utilize machine learning models to determine suggested associations for fields on webpages, leading to repetitive and error-prone manual submissions, which waste time and resources.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning models to determine suggested associations between column data in tabular data and fields on webpages by comparing data types and field names, allowing for automated and dynamic submission processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If machine learning models are used to determine suggested associations for fields on webpages, then submission accuracy and automation capability are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubmission accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces machine learning models as intermediary components that mediate between tabular data and webpage fields. These models process column data and field information to generate suggested associations, acting as a bridge that enables accurate automated submissions without requiring direct complex mappings between data sources and targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical mapping processes with automated machine learning-based association determination. Instead of manually configuring field mappings or using rigid rules, the system uses ML models to dynamically determine associations based on data types and field names, substituting mechanical configuration with intelligent automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual submissions are performed repeatedly, then flexibility and control are maintained, but time consumption and error rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidsubmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the machine learning models automatically determine field associations and generate submissions without requiring repeated manual user intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously processing tabular data, determining mappings, and executing submissions, thereby eliminating time-consuming repetitive manual tasks while maintaining operational effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If automatic submission methods are used without machine learning, then system simplicity is maintained, but association accuracy and adaptability to data changes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidassociation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs machine learning models that dynamically adjust association parameters based on input data characteristics. The models analyze data types, field names, and contextual information to determine optimal associations, allowing the system to adapt to changing data structures and maintain high association accuracy without requiring complex pre-configured rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250272352A1Systems and methods for dynamically automating submissions
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20250272352A1 patent drawing
  • US20250272352A1 patent drawing
  • US20250272352A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed embodiments may include a method for dynamically automating submissions. The method may include receiving tabular data and one or more associations of columns from the tabular data to fields on a webpage for one or more submissions, and extracting column data from the tabular data, determining, using a first machine learning model, one or more suggested associations for the fields on the webpage based on data types for the fields, and determining, using a second machine learning model, one or more suggested associations for the fields based on column names of the extracted column data. In response to determining one or more suggested associations, sending to a user device the one or more suggested associations, receiving, from the user device, accepted suggested associations; and transmitting one or more submissions for each row in the tabular data using the one or more suggested associations and the accepted suggested associations.