ML Floorplan Generation for AP Power Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Effective management of Access Point (AP) power levels across a network to ensure optimal client experiences is challenging due to issues like Overlapping Basic Service Sets (OBSS) and coverage gaps, which existing technologies struggle to address efficiently, especially in complex floor-wide deployments.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that uses machine learning models to generate floor plans by transmitting test frames at unique transmission power levels, incorporating client report data to optimize AP power management, enabling active cooperation between APs and Station (STA) devices to adjust power levels dynamically and reduce interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If AP power is set too high, then coverage area is improved, but interference and OBSS occur causing deteriorated client connectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where APs transmit test frames at different power levels and receive client report data containing RSSI measurements. This feedback loop enables the system to determine optimal power levels by analyzing the relationship between transmitted power and received signal strength, thereby maximizing coverage while minimizing interference and OBSS conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying transmission power levels across multiple test frames. The system transmits test frames at different power levels (e.g., first power level, second power level) and uses machine learning models to analyze the results, identifying the optimal power parameter that balances coverage area with interference reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If AP power is set too low, then interference is reduced, but coverage gaps emerge leaving areas underserved

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidcoverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism collects client report data with RSSI measurements from multiple APs. By analyzing this feedback, the system identifies coverage gaps where signal strength falls below acceptable thresholds, enabling targeted power adjustments that expand coverage without causing excessive interference in already-served areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by making differentiated power adjustments for different APs based on their specific coverage characteristics. Rather than uniform power reduction, each AP's power level is optimized individually based on local coverage requirements and interference conditions, ensuring adequate coverage in underserved areas while maintaining low interference levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If machine learning models are used to optimize power levels, then coverage optimization is improved, but system complexity increases due to standardized frame requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by designing standardized test frames that serve multiple functions: they carry power level information, enable RSSI measurement, and provide input for machine learning models. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate communication protocols, reducing system complexity while maintaining advanced optimization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized test frames act as an intermediary mechanism between the control system and client devices. Rather than requiring direct complex interactions between APs and clients for power optimization, the test frames mediate the information exchange, simplifying the overall system architecture while enabling sophisticated machine learning-based optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240380672A1Generating Floorplans via Machine Learning in Network Devices
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20240380672A1 patent drawing
  • US20240380672A1 patent drawing
  • US20240380672A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices, systems, methods, and processes for network device power management at the floor level are described herein. Network devices can communicate with various devices in a wireless network. However, environmental changes, barriers, and other hazards exist in each deployment environment. To better understand each deployment environment, a floorplan can be generated by sending out a plurality of test frames. These test frames can be formatted with power data that is associated with the transmission power level that each test frame is transmitted at. The receiving network device can compare this power data with an actual measurement of the received signals. This data can all be packaged into a client report that can be sent back to the transmitting device which can then process this client report from multiple network devices such that a floorplan can be generated which can be utilized to make more efficient network decisions in the future.