Automated Fraud Detection via ML Anomaly Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic service providers face challenges in detecting fraudulent activities in real-time due to the evolving nature of malicious transactions, making it difficult to identify anomalies in streaming device data and process high volumes of customer inputs manually, which can lead to significant losses.

Innovation Solution

An anomaly detection system leveraging machine learning techniques, such as probability density functions, to identify anomalies in real-time based on device attributes, and an analysis system that automatically classifies customer inputs using machine learning models to detect fraudulent activities, thereby reducing manual effort and increasing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual review of transactions is performed, then accuracy in detecting fraudulent activities may be maintained, but productivity decreases due to the large volume of transactions processed daily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in detecting fraudulent activitiesVSAvoidtransaction processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces computer models and automated analysis systems as intermediaries between transaction data and human reviewers. These models pre-analyze transactions, flag suspicious patterns, and prioritize cases for manual review, enabling human experts to focus on high-risk transactions while maintaining both high accuracy and processing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated computer-based analysis systems that use machine learning algorithms to detect fraudulent patterns. This substitution enables processing of large transaction volumes at machine speed while maintaining detection accuracy through sophisticated pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If larger review and compliance teams are deployed to handle high transaction volumes, then productivity increases, but device complexity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction review capacityVSAvoidcompliance team structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service automated systems that perform transaction analysis, risk assessment, and anomaly detection without requiring large human teams. The system autonomously processes transactions, learns from patterns, and adapts to new fraud tactics, replacing complex human organizational structures with streamlined automated workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If sophisticated security measures are implemented to detect evolving fraudulent tactics, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidsecurity system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic security systems that continuously adapt to evolving fraud tactics through machine learning. The models are trained on historical data and automatically update their detection parameters, enabling the system to maintain high reliability against new fraudulent schemes without requiring proportional increases in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of detection by using multiple analytical models that examine transactions from different perspectives (e.g., velocity checks, pattern recognition, network analysis). By varying the analytical parameters rather than increasing system size, the patent achieves sophisticated detection capabilities with controlled complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11677781B2Automated device data retrieval and analysis platform
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 PAYPAL INC
  • US11677781B2 patent drawing
  • US11677781B2 patent drawing
  • US11677781B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There are provided systems and methods for an automated device data retrieval and analysis platform. A service provider server invokes an instance of an application in a remote processing environment using device data associated with the application and sends a control message that prompts the instance to send a request to a web server for a process script that invokes a process executable in the remote processing environment. The service provider server obtains traffic data a behavior of application data based on an interaction between the instance and the web server, and determines features of the application in a native state from the behavior of the application data. The server generates a data profile of the application that indicates the features in the native state and provides the data profile to a remote engine to detect potential malicious activity associated with the application from the detection operation.