Machine Learning Hazard Prediction for Reflexive Movements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unplanned reflexive movements by workers in industrial environments can create hazards for themselves and others, as these movements are often instantaneous and lack active control, making it difficult for existing technologies to anticipate and mitigate such hazards effectively.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using machine learning to monitor individuals in a physical space, detect stimuli, predict reflexive movements, and determine if these movements will result in hazardous conditions. If a hazard is predicted, the system initiates remedial actions to mitigate the risk, such as alerting the individual or recommending preventive measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reflexive movements are detected and prevented, then safety is improved, but response time must be extremely short due to the instantaneous nature of reflex actions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of stimuli that could trigger reflexive movements before the actual reflex action occurs. By identifying potential hazards in advance (such as sudden noises, bright lights, or unexpected object movements), the system can issue warnings or activate protective measures before the reflexive movement happens, thus maintaining safety without needing to respond after the fact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary computational layer between the stimulus and the reflexive movement. Sensors detect environmental stimuli, the processing system analyzes potential hazards using machine learning models, and only then triggers warnings or protective actions. This intermediary process allows the system to manage the time delay inherent in analyzing and responding to reflex-triggering events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to predict reflexive movements, then prediction accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The prediction system is segmented into multiple specialized components: stimulus detection sensors, machine learning models for different types of reflexes (startle response, withdrawal reflex, etc.), and specific prediction algorithms for different hazard scenarios. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, improving overall prediction accuracy while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model is designed as a universal system that can handle multiple types of reflexive movements and hazard scenarios through a single integrated platform. The model learns from diverse training data encompassing various stimulus types and reflex responses, allowing it to generalize across different situations without requiring separate specialized systems for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250029338A1Prediction and mitigation of hazardous conditions
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250029338A1 patent drawing
  • US20250029338A1 patent drawing
  • US20250029338A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer implemented methods, systems, and computer program products include program code executing on a processor(s) that monitors one or more individuals within the physical space. The program code detects a stimulus within the physical space. The program code determines, based on applying a trained machine learning model, that the stimulus will result in a hazardous condition in the physical space. To make this determination, the program code predicts, based on the model, that the stimulus will trigger a reflexive movement of at least one individual of the one or more individuals in the physical space and determines, based on the model and based on the predicted reflexive movement that the reflexive movement will result in a hazardous condition in the physical space. The program code initiates a remedial action to mitigate the hazardous condition.