Machine Learning Hot Spot Prediction for Lithography Defects

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lithographic processes face challenges in accurately predicting and controlling hot spots and defects in semiconductor manufacturing, which can affect the quality and yield of integrated circuits and other devices.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing machine learning models trained on characteristics such as process windows, geometric shapes, and metrology data to identify and predict hot spots and defects, incorporating simulation and empirical data for improved defect detection and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional metrology processes are used to monitor and control patterning processes, then manufacturing precision can be maintained within existing limits, but the ability to detect and predict hot spots and defects is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidhot spot prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by training machine learning models in advance using simulated metrology data and empirical defect data before actual manufacturing. The models are pre-trained to recognize patterns that indicate potential hot spots and defects, enabling early prediction and intervention before actual manufacturing defects occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces machine learning models as an intermediary between traditional metrology measurements and defect prediction. These models act as a mediator that processes metrology data and transforms it into predictive insights about hot spots and defects, bridging the gap between measurement and reliability assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models are trained on simulated and empirical data to predict hot spots and defects, then defect detection capability is improved, but computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehot spot detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex machine learning system into distinct components: a training phase using simulated and empirical data, and a deployment phase using trained models for prediction. This segmentation allows the complex computational work to be performed offline during training, while the deployed system requires minimal real-time computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computational work by training machine learning models in advance using extensive simulated and empirical datasets. This pre-training eliminates the need for complex real-time computations during actual manufacturing, as the models are already optimized for prediction tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional patterning processes are used without advanced defect prediction, then manufacturing speed is maintained, but manufacturing precision and yield are limited by undetected hot spots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting hot spots and defects before manufacturing occurs. The machine learning models identify potential problems in advance, allowing process adjustments to be made before production, thereby improving precision without slowing down actual manufacturing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using predicted hot spot and defect information to adjust patterning process parameters. The system continuously learns from manufacturing outcomes and uses this feedback to improve future predictions and process control, enhancing both precision and productivity over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250341785A1Identification of hot spots or defects by machine learning
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US20250341785A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341785A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341785A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of identifying a hot spot from a design layout or of predicting whether a pattern in a design layout is defective, using a machine learning model. An example method disclosed herein includes obtaining sets of one or more characteristics of performance of hot spots, respectively, under a plurality of process conditions, respectively, in a device manufacturing process; determining, for each of the process conditions, for each of the hot spots, based on the one or more characteristics under that process condition, whether that hot spot is defective; obtaining a characteristic of each of the process conditions; obtaining a characteristic of each of the hot spots; and training a machine learning model using a training set including the characteristic of one of the process conditions, the characteristic of one of the hot spots, and whether that hot spot is defective under that process condition.