Machine Learning Image Classification for Fraudulent Receipt Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current expense report auditing systems rely heavily on human auditors, which can lead to inefficiencies, errors, and resource wastage, and lack effective mechanisms for detecting fraudulent or duplicate receipts.

Innovation Solution

Implementing machine learning models trained on historical data to classify images as authentic or generated, and to detect duplicate or fraudulent receipts, integrating Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for extracting receipt data, and using policy models to ensure compliance with organizational policies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human auditors are used for expense report auditing, then accuracy in detecting fraudulent receipts can be maintained, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate due to manual processing time and resource constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in detecting fraudulent receiptsVSAvoidauditing speed and efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual human auditing with an automated machine learning-based image analysis system. The system uses trained models to detect fraudulent receipts, duplicate submissions, and policy violations automatically, eliminating the need for manual human review while maintaining high accuracy through sophisticated image authentication algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces machine learning models as an intermediary between the expense report submission and final approval. These models act as a mediator that pre-screens receipts, identifies potential fraud, and flags suspicious patterns before human or automated approval, thereby improving both accuracy and productivity by handling the initial filtering at scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If more human auditors are deployed to improve fraud detection accuracy, then reliability improves, but loss of time and resource wastage worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidauditing time and resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces multiple human auditors with a single automated machine learning system that can process unlimited receipts simultaneously. The system uses ensemble models and multiple analysis techniques to maintain high fraud detection accuracy without requiring additional human time or resources, as the automated system operates at machine speed with no fatigue or downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary fraud detection and authentication analysis automatically before human review or approval processes. By pre-screening all receipts through machine learning models that detect fake images, duplicates, and policy violations upfront, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming manual verification of legitimate receipts, thereby reducing overall auditing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If traditional auditing methods are used, then ease of operation is maintained with simple processes, but device complexity worsens when implementing automated detection systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of auditing processVSAvoidcomplexity of automated detection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses image copying and comparison techniques to detect fraudulent receipts. The system creates digital copies of submitted receipts and compares them against known fraudulent patterns, database entries, and authentication features. This copying approach maintains operational simplicity by working with familiar image formats while enabling sophisticated automated detection through pattern recognition and comparison algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal machine learning system that performs multiple auditing functions simultaneously - detecting fake images, identifying duplicates, verifying policy compliance, and extracting receipt data. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate complex systems into a single automated platform, managing complexity through integration while providing comprehensive fraud detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If automated systems are implemented to increase productivity, then auditing speed improves, but reliability worsens due to potential errors in automated classification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauditing speedVSAvoidaccuracy of fraud detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple machine learning models and detection techniques into a unified automated auditing system. By combining image authentication models, duplicate detection algorithms, policy compliance checkers, and fraud pattern recognizers, the system achieves high reliability through ensemble decision-making. The merged system cross-validates findings across multiple models, reducing individual model errors while maintaining high processing speed through parallel operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the automated system continuously learns from audit outcomes and fraud cases. The machine learning models are retrained and refined based on detected fraud patterns, false positive analysis, and updated policy requirements. This feedback loop improves reliability over time by adapting the system to emerging fraud techniques while maintaining high auditing speed through automated model updates and continuous learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11568400B2Anomaly and fraud detection with fake event detection using machine learning
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 SAP SE
  • US11568400B2 patent drawing
  • US11568400B2 patent drawing
  • US11568400B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure involves systems, software, and computer implemented methods for transaction auditing. One example method includes training at least one machine learning model to determine features that can be used to determine whether an image is an authentic image of a document or an automatically generated document image, using a training set of authentic images and a training set of automatically generated document images. A request to classify an image as either an authentic image of a document or an automatically generated document image is received. The machine learning model(s) are used to classify the image as either an authentic image of a document or an automatically generated document image, based on features included in the image that are identified by the machine learning model(s). A classification of the image is provided. The machine learning model(s) are updated based on the image and the classification of the image.