ML Image Inpainting Using Ground-Truth CVAE Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inpainting, the process of replacing unwanted data in images with replacement data, is challenging due to its non-deterministic nature, leading to multiple possible solutions and inefficiencies in existing methods.

Innovation Solution

A machine-learned model, specifically a conditional variational autoencoder, is trained using ground truth data and augmented data with masks to accurately predict and replace unwanted data by encoding and decoding image data, utilizing loss functions to refine system parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional inpainting methods are used to replace unwanted data, then multiple possible solutions can be generated, but the process becomes non-deterministic and computationally inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemultiple possible solutionsVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the inpainting problem from a non-deterministic search for multiple solutions into a deterministic optimization problem by changing the mathematical parameters and formulation. The continuous relaxation of the discrete optimization problem allows for efficient gradient-based optimization while maintaining the ability to generate high-quality inpainted results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical or algorithmic inpainting methods with a machine learning model (U-Net architecture) that learns the inpainting process from training data. This substitution enables the system to generate consistent, high-quality results without the computational inefficiency of exploring multiple possible solutions through traditional algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual editing is used for inpainting, then high precision can be achieved, but the process requires significant time and human resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinpainting qualityVSAvoidmanual editing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service inpainting system where the machine learning model automatically performs the inpainting task without human intervention. The U-Net model, trained on diverse image data, can independently handle various inpainting scenarios with high quality results, eliminating the need for manual editing while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of the machine learning model on large datasets before deployment. This preliminary action enables the model to learn effective inpainting strategies in advance, allowing it to quickly and accurately process new images without requiring manual intervention during actual use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If existing inpainting algorithms are applied, then unwanted data can be replaced, but computing resources are consumed inefficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinpainting capabilityVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces computationally intensive traditional inpainting algorithms with a trained machine learning model that performs inference. Once trained, the U-Net model can generate inpainted results with significantly lower computational resource consumption compared to iterative optimization methods or multiple algorithmic approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs the computationally expensive work during the training phase, where the model learns from large datasets. After training, the model can perform inpainting with minimal computational resources, as the heavy lifting of learning patterns has already been completed. This separates the high-cost learning phase from the low-cost application phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12482078B2Machine learning for high quality image processing
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12482078B2 patent drawing
  • US12482078B2 patent drawing
  • US12482078B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system or method for inpainting can be aided through the use of machine learning and ground truth data training. The training of machine-learning inpainting models through the use of ground truth image data may add efficiency and precision to the field of image inpainting. Furthermore, machine-learning inpainting models can aid in the non-deterministic prediction of a variety of data types and can be applicable to the removing and/or replacing of a variety of data types. The trained models can be enabled to make predictions without ground truth reassurance due to calibrated parameters tuned through the training.