ML Image Processing for Targeted Crop and Weed Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural technologies face challenges in efficiently and sustainably managing crop production to meet the increasing global food demand, particularly in effectively detecting and controlling undesirable vegetation, which affects land, chemical, time, labor, and cost efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system mounted on agricultural vehicles that uses image processing and sensors to detect and identify agricultural objects, track their growth stages, and apply targeted treatments, such as chemical sprays or mechanical actions, to optimize resource use and reduce unwanted vegetation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional agricultural techniques are used for crop production, then labor and chemical use are high, but productivity and resource efficiency remain limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop production efficiencyVSAvoidchemical consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical and chemical agricultural practices with a machine learning-based vision system. The system uses image processing and ML algorithms to detect, classify, and track agricultural objects, enabling automated decision-making that reduces chemical application and optimizes resource usage while maintaining or improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of agricultural treatment by using ML-predicted growth stages to determine optimal treatment timing and dosage. This dynamic parameter adjustment based on real-time object detection and classification enables precise chemical application only when and where needed, reducing overall chemical consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If incremental agricultural techniques are applied, then some improvements are achieved, but land, time, and cost efficiency still pose challenges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood production outputVSAvoidagricultural operation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous monitoring and tracking of agricultural objects throughout their growth cycles. The system maintains persistent object identities across multiple time points, enabling uninterrupted observation and continuous optimization of treatment timing, thereby reducing idle time and maximizing productive operational time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection, classification, and tracking of agricultural objects before treatment is applied. By identifying objects and predicting their growth stages in advance, the system prepares optimal treatment plans beforehand, reducing on-site decision time and enabling faster, more efficient execution of agricultural operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If machine learning algorithms are implemented for target detection, then precision in identifying agricultural objects is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex agricultural monitoring task into distinct functional modules: image acquisition, object detection, classification, tracking, and treatment decision-making. Each module handles a specific aspect of the process, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable while achieving high detection precision through specialized algorithms in each segment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of substance

If targeted treatment is applied to identified targets, then resource consumption is reduced, but the need for accurate target identification increases system requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource consumptionVSAvoidtarget identification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where detection results inform treatment decisions, and treatment outcomes feed back into future detection and classification. This continuous feedback mechanism improves target identification reliability over time by learning from actual results and adjusting detection parameters, while ensuring resources are applied only to confirmed targets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11937524B2Applying multiple processing schemes to target objects
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 VERDANT ROBOTICS INC
  • US11937524B2 patent drawing
  • US11937524B2 patent drawing
  • US11937524B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes obtaining, by the treatment system configured to implement a machine learning (ML) algorithm, one or more images of a region of an agricultural environment near the treatment system, wherein the one or more images are captured from the region of a real-world where agricultural target objects are expected to be present, determining one or more parameters for use with the ML algorithm, wherein at least one of the one or more parameters is based on one or more ML models related to identification of an agricultural object, determining a real-world target in the one or more images using the ML algorithm, wherein the ML algorithm is at least partly implemented using the one or more processors of the treatment system, and applying a treatment to the target by selectively activating the treatment mechanism based on a result of the determining the target.