Machine Learning Model for Infectious Disease Testing Protocols

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current testing platforms for infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, lack a safe and effective routine for determining appropriate testing protocols, especially in the context of emerging pandemics where asymptomatic spread and varying population immunity pose significant challenges.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven system utilizing a computing device to receive user data, generate training data, and train a machine-learning model that correlates user parameters with infectious disease prediction parameters, generating infectivity parameters and determining a confidence metric to inform testing protocols based on comparison to a retest target threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If routine testing is implemented broadly, then detection coverage is improved, but resource consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes testing parameters (confidence thresholds, retest intervals) based on individual user risk profiles generated by the machine learning model, allowing routine testing to be adapted to each user's specific circumstances rather than applying a uniform protocol to all users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where test results and user data are continuously fed back into the machine learning model to update risk assessments and adjust future testing recommendations, enabling the system to learn from outcomes and optimize resource allocation over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If machine-learning models are trained with extensive user data, then prediction accuracy is improved, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and normalizing user data before it enters the machine learning model, and by pre-calculating risk profiles for users with incomplete data, reducing the computational burden during actual prediction operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model is segmented into modular components that can process different aspects of user data independently, allowing for parallel processing and reducing overall computation time while maintaining prediction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11430575B2Systems and methods for a data driven disease test result prediction
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 SPECIALTY DIAGNOSTIC (SDI) LAB INC
  • US11430575B2 patent drawing
  • US11430575B2 patent drawing
  • US11430575B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for a data driven disease test result prediction, the system comprising a computing device configured to receive user data, wherein the user data includes user parameters, generate, using the user data, training data wherein the training data includes a plurality of entries wherein each entry correlates user parameter data to at least a prediction parameter of the plurality of prediction parameters associated with an infectious disease, train, using the training data and a machine-learning process, a machine-learning model, wherein the trained machine-learning model is configured to generate a plurality of infectivity parameters; compare the plurality of infectivity parameters to a retest target threshold, and determine, as a function of the comparison, a confidence metric, wherein the confidence metric informs a testing protocol.