ML Intent Prediction for Air Traffic Collision Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current air traffic monitoring systems often generate unnecessary alerts due to their reliance on physics-based monitoring, which can overload air traffic controllers with extraneous information and desensitize them to actual collision risks, as they predict potential collisions that do not materialize.

Innovation Solution

The use of vehicle intent prediction models generated through machine learning algorithms analyzing past vehicle track data and contextual factors, such as weather and aircraft type, to predict future trajectories and reduce the number of alerts by distinguishing real collision risks from non-risk scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If physics-based monitoring is used to predict potential collisions, then the system can identify safety risks, but it generates excessive false alerts that overload controllers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision risk identificationVSAvoidsignal reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring system into two distinct components: a physics-based monitoring component that identifies potential collision risks, and a machine learning-based intent prediction component that filters false alerts. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in its strength while compensating for the other's weaknesses, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive risk identification and alert accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves as an intermediary between the physics-based monitoring system and the air traffic controllers. It processes the raw collision risk predictions, adds contextual understanding through intent prediction, and outputs filtered, high-confidence alerts. This intermediary layer transforms the unreliable signal stream into actionable intelligence without losing the original system's risk detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If physics-based monitoring predicts all potential collisions, then comprehensive safety coverage is achieved, but controller attention is depleted by false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverageVSAvoidcontroller workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of alerting controllers to all potential collision risks (excessive action), the system uses the machine learning model to perform partial action by selectively filtering alerts. The ML model predicts vehicle intent and only generates alerts when there is high confidence of actual collision risk, thereby maintaining comprehensive safety coverage while reducing controller workload by eliminating false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If traditional monitoring systems alert on all predicted collisions, then no real risks are missed, but controllers become desensitized to actual dangers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk detection completenessVSAvoidalert accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback through the machine learning model that continuously learns from past collision incidents and refines its intent prediction accuracy. The ML model analyzes historical data to understand patterns of actual collision risks versus false alarms, and uses this feedback to improve its filtering decisions, thereby maintaining complete risk detection while progressively improving alert accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9691286B2Data driven airplane intent inferencing
Publication Date: 2017.06.27 THE BOEING CO
  • US9691286B2 patent drawing
  • US9691286B2 patent drawing
  • US9691286B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method, system and computer program product for providing a predicted vehicle track and for providing alerts when two predicted vehicle tracks are closer than a threshold amount. A vehicle intent prediction model is generated based on past instance of tracks for a vehicle operation, known vehicle intent data for the past instances, and contextual factors, such as weather, airline operator, air vehicle type or configuration, day of the week, etc. for the past instances. The vehicle intent prediction model can be generated using one or more machine learning algorithms. A future vehicle trajectory for a current vehicle operation can be output by the vehicle intent prediction model using the current track and existing contextual factors for the current vehicle operation. In the event that two vehicles following their respective predicted vehicle future trajectories would be closer than a threshold distance, an alert can be provided.