Machine Learning Inversion Bandpass Filtering Borehole Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machine learning methods are not well-suited for mapping physical responses to material properties in wellbore environments due to instability issues, such as non-one-to-one correspondences and incompatible data bandwidths between sensed and calculated data, leading to inaccurate material property identification.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a machine learning model with bandpass filtering to constrain its output to match the expected bandwidth of sensed data, ensuring a one-to-one mapping of physical responses to material properties, and using recursive processes and gradient calculations to refine the model's evaluations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If machine learning is used to map physical responses to material properties, then speed of material property identification is improved, but mapping stability deteriorates due to non-one-to-one correspondences and incompatible data bandwidths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of material property identificationVSAvoidmapping stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the machine learning model's output through bandpass filtering to match the bandwidth characteristics of the sensed data. This involves adjusting the frequency parameters of the modeled physical responses to be compatible with the sensor measurements, thereby achieving stable one-to-one mapping while maintaining fast identification speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces bandpass filtering as an intermediary step between the machine learning model and the material property determination. This filtering mechanism acts as a mediator that reconciles the bandwidth incompatibility between computed and sensed data, enabling stable correspondence without sacrificing the speed advantage of machine learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If machine learning models are used for inversion, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to incompatible data bandwidths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity of wellbore operationsVSAvoidprecision of material property determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the output parameters of the machine learning model by applying bandpass filtering that aligns the frequency content with the sensed data bandwidth. This parameter adjustment ensures that the modeled physical responses are comparable to actual measurements, thereby maintaining high productivity while improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the modeled data is compared with sensed data, and the bandpass filtering is applied iteratively to refine the model output. This feedback loop ensures that the material property determinations are both efficient and precise by continuously adjusting the model predictions to match observed measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240393494A1Machine learning-assisted full-band inversion for borehole sensing
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US20240393494A1 patent drawing
  • US20240393494A1 patent drawing
  • US20240393494A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides techniques to identify material properties from measured physical response data in ways that are more efficient than conventional numerical inversion. Systems and techniques of the present disclosure may use machine learning (ML) techniques to generate mappings that map specific physical responses to specific material properties based on knowledge of factors that may be inherent to certain types of sensing equipment. Data generated by a ML computer model may be constrained, altered, or filtered to more closely correspond to characteristics known to be associated with a certain type of sensing equipment. Such a constrained model may identify fewer possible results as compared to an unconstrained model, thereby, solving problems that may be encountered when using ML techniques to identify material properties from measured responses.