ML Journal Entry Generation for Intercompany Reconciliation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The reconciliation of intercompany accounts receivable and payable is labor-intensive and prone to errors due to differences in accounting systems, currencies, and timing, leading to potential misstatements in consolidated financial reports and compliance issues.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using machine learning to automatically generate journal entries that reconcile discrepancies by training a model on historical data characteristics, including currency exchange rates and seasonality, to align accounts payable and receivable across entities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual reconciliation processes are used to review financial records and identify discrepancies, then employees can investigate root causes and make adjustments, but the process becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of financial reconciliationVSAvoidtime required for reconciliation process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service reconciliation by automatically detecting discrepancies between accounts payable and receivable, generating root cause analyses, and proposing journal entries without requiring manual employee intervention for each discrepancy. The automated discrepancy detection system continuously monitors financial records and resolves mismatches independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of employee review and analysis with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to detect discrepancies, analyze root causes, and generate reconciliation entries. This substitution eliminates manual labor while maintaining or improving reconciliation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If employees manually investigate discrepancies by reviewing financial records and communicating with customers or suppliers, then root causes can be identified, but the process becomes complex and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of discrepancy detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of reconciliation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs multiple functions within a single integrated platform: it detects discrepancies, analyzes root causes, generates journal entries, and tracks reconciliation status. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate manual processes and systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an automated intermediary layer between accounts payable and receivable records that continuously monitors for mismatches and facilitates reconciliation. This intermediary automatically communicates with financial systems and generates corrective entries, replacing the need for manual employee communication with customers or suppliers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If comprehensive review of financial records is conducted to ensure accurate reconciliation, then financial accuracy is improved, but the resource burden and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of financial recordsVSAvoidresource consumption for reconciliation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service reconciliation by automatically detecting and correcting discrepancies without requiring extensive human resources. The automated discrepancy detection and journal entry generation eliminate the need for manual review of every financial record, significantly reducing resource consumption while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where reconciliation results are automatically fed back into the financial records system. This feedback mechanism ensures that once a discrepancy is detected and corrected, the system learns from the pattern and prevents similar discrepancies, improving accuracy over time while reducing ongoing resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260064660A1Automatically and intelligently creating journal entries to solve mismatches identified via the intercompany elimination reporting process
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US20260064660A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064660A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064660A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media are provided for automatically and intelligently creating journal entries, such as journal entries to solve mismatches identified via the intercompany elimination reporting process. In an example, a machine learning model is trained to generate journal entries such as journal entries based on certain characteristics of historical journal entries associated with historical discrepancies. The trained machine learning model may be used, for example, to automatically generate a journal entry by recording a ledger acknowledging a discrepancy between a first data entry of a first entity and a second data entry of a second entity. The journal entry automatically generated using the machine learning model may reconcile the discrepancy, for example, by recording the ledger in alignment with the first data entry of the first entity or in alignment with the second data entry of the second entity.