ML-Based Maintenance Scheduling for Semiconductor Equipment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern semiconductor manufacturing faces challenges in efficiently determining chip quality and scheduling maintenance for equipment due to increased complexity and data volume, with existing methods relying heavily on human expertise and intuition, which are inadequate for modern high-density and high-reliability standards.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Machine Learning (ML) models that utilize semiconductor testing data to selectively filter chips for further testing and schedule maintenance based on sensor data, leveraging predictive analytics to uncover complex interactions and optimize decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human expertise and intuition are used to determine chip quality and maintenance scheduling, then the approach is simple to implement, but the accuracy is insufficient for modern high-density and high-reliability standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human expert intuition and manual analysis with machine learning algorithms that automatically analyze sensor data from semiconductor manufacturing equipment. The ML models process multiple parameters simultaneously to predict chip quality outcomes and equipment maintenance needs, achieving higher accuracy than human experts while handling the complexity through automated computational systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If all chips undergo extensive failure testing, then quality assurance is maximized, but testing costs and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assuranceVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial testing by using ML models to predict which chips are likely to fail based on sensor data from manufacturing processes. Only chips with predicted high failure probability undergo extensive failure testing, while chips with low predicted failure probability are excluded from costly testing. This partial action approach maintains quality assurance for at-risk chips while significantly improving overall testing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If maintenance is performed on a fixed schedule, then equipment reliability is maintained, but unnecessary maintenance activities increase downtime and costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses machine learning models to analyze sensor data and predict equipment failures before they occur. Maintenance is scheduled proactively based on predicted failure timelines rather than following a fixed schedule. This preliminary action allows maintenance to be performed just in time, ensuring equipment reliability while minimizing unnecessary maintenance activities and associated downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If the number of tests and parameters increased, then quality detection capability improved, but the complexity of uncovering parameter interactions became difficult for human experts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality detection capabilityVSAvoidparameter interaction analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human expert analysis with machine learning algorithms that automatically process and analyze multiple test parameters simultaneously. The ML models uncover complex interactions between parameters through pattern recognition in sensor data, achieving high quality detection capability without the cognitive limitations of human experts when dealing with multivariate relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11295993B2Maintenance scheduling for semiconductor manufacturing equipment
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 PDF SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11295993B2 patent drawing
  • US11295993B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A maintenance tool for semiconductor process equipment and components. Sensor data is evaluated by machine learning tools to determine when to schedule maintenance action.