Machine Learning Memory Compatibility Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Identifying compatible memory types for computing devices is challenging due to varying hardware and software configurations, leading to inefficiencies and resource wastage in manual testing and compatibility determination.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model is trained using review data, natural language processing, and memory speed test results to determine compatibility between memory devices and computing devices, reducing the need for manual testing and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual testing is used to determine memory compatibility, then compatibility determination can be performed, but it leads to inefficiencies and resource wastage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility determination efficiencyVSAvoidtime for manual testing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual testing processes with an automated machine learning-based system. The machine learning model processes hardware configuration data and memory device specifications to automatically determine compatibility, eliminating the need for manual physical testing and significantly improving efficiency while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual representation of the compatibility determination process through a machine learning model that replicates and automates the manual testing logic. The model uses training data from previous compatibility assessments to make predictions about new memory device compatibility without requiring repeated manual testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If manual testing is used to identify compatible memory types, then compatibility can be assessed, but computing resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility assessment accuracyVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes resource-intensive manual testing with a computationally efficient machine learning model. The model processes configuration data through algorithmic analysis rather than physical testing, maintaining assessment accuracy while dramatically reducing computing resource consumption and energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of the machine learning model using historical compatibility data and testing results. This preliminary action allows the model to make accurate compatibility predictions without requiring extensive computing resources during actual compatibility assessment, as the heavy computational work is done once during training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If multiple memory types are tested manually, then compatibility information can be gathered, but the process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility information completenessVSAvoidtesting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a universal machine learning model that can assess compatibility across multiple memory types and device configurations through a single integrated system. The model processes various hardware configurations and memory specifications using the same algorithmic framework, eliminating the need for separate testing procedures for each memory type and reducing overall process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy of the compatibility assessment process through the machine learning model, which replicates the analysis that would otherwise require multiple manual testing procedures. The model processes and compares multiple memory types against device specifications through algorithmic evaluation, maintaining information completeness while simplifying the testing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240161169A1Using machine learning to identify memory compatibility
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20240161169A1 patent drawing
  • US20240161169A1 patent drawing
  • US20240161169A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a device may obtain an input that identifies a device type. The device may obtain, based on the input, information indicating a configuration associated with the device type. The device may determine, using a plurality of machine learning models respectively associated with a plurality of memory types, compatibilities between the plurality of memory types and the device type based on the configuration associated with the device type. Each of the plurality of machine learning models may be trained to determine a compatibility of a respective memory type, of the plurality of memory types, with a given configuration. The device may determine a recommendation of one or more memory types for the device type based on the compatibilities between the plurality of memory types and the device type. The device may transmit an indication of the recommendation of the one or more memory types.