ML Metadata Prediction for PCB Design Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual creation of product definitions and population of metadata for printed circuit board design is a time-consuming and error-prone process, requiring engineering expertise and dependent on reviewing component datasheets to generate design constraints for electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

A computing system employing a machine-learning algorithm trained on previously generated product models to predict metadata for electronic systems, correlating attributes with design constraints and parameter values for electrical connectivity, automating the population of metadata into product models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual creation of product definitions and metadata population is performed, then design constraints can be correctly applied, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of metadataVSAvoidtime for data entry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating metadata and design constraints through machine learning algorithms. The algorithm trained on historical product data autonomously populates product definitions without requiring manual engineering expertise, thus improving accuracy while reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of reviewing datasheets and entering data is replaced with an automated computational system. The machine learning algorithm substitutes the human expert's analytical work, using trained models to predict and generate accurate metadata and design constraints automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual review of component datasheets is performed to generate design constraints, then engineering expertise can be applied, but the process becomes dependent on expert availability and introduces human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of design constraintsVSAvoidspeed of constraint generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures and codifies engineering expertise into the machine learning algorithm, enabling it to independently generate high-quality design constraints without requiring human experts to manually review each datasheet. The algorithm serves itself by learning from historical data and applying that knowledge automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms qualitative engineering judgment into quantitative parameters by training the machine learning algorithm on historical design data. This converts expert knowledge into computational parameters that can be rapidly processed and applied consistently across multiple products, improving both quality and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated machine-learning algorithms are used to predict metadata, then time and errors are reduced, but the system requires training data and computational resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of metadata generationVSAvoidcomplexity of prediction system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by training the machine learning algorithm in advance on historical product data and metadata. This upfront training phase builds the computational model's knowledge base, enabling it to rapidly generate accurate predictions during actual product development without requiring complex real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a computational copy of engineering expertise by training the algorithm on historical design data and metadata patterns. This digital replica of expert knowledge allows the system to replicate the decision-making process automatically, reducing the need for complex human intervention while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240354453A1Metadata prediction for product design
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC
  • US20240354453A1 patent drawing
  • US20240354453A1 patent drawing
  • US20240354453A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This application discloses a computing system (400) to generate a product model (409) that describes attributes of a product including an electronic system (401). The computing system (400) can implement a machine-learning algorithm having been trained with metadata populated in previously generated product models for different electronic systems, which can determine one or more sets of metadata capable of being correlated to the electronic system included in the product model based on the attributes of the electronic system described in the product model. The sets of metadata can correspond to different design constraints in the product model associated with electrical connectivity for the electronic system and their corresponding parameter values. The computing system can populate at least one of the sets of metadata into the product model to correlate with the electronic system.