Machine Learning Model Authentication via Digital Key Gate Nodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine learning models in healthcare and other domains face significant security risks due to potential breaches in data privacy and model integrity, making it challenging to determine if a model has been compromised, especially with malicious attacks modifying weights or exploiting vulnerabilities in input data.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that uses digital keys to transition gate nodes within machine learning models between locked and unlocked states, allowing only authorized access and ensuring the integrity of the model by generating verification outputs that can be compared to known outputs, thereby detecting any compromise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If machine learning models are made accessible for various applications, then productivity and utility are improved, but security vulnerability and risk of compromise increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accessibility and utilityVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces digital keys as intermediary elements that mediate between the machine learning model and users. These keys act as credentials that authorize access to the model, enabling productivity while preventing unauthorized access. The digital keys are interspersed within the model architecture to control data flow and model execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the machine learning model by inserting gate nodes at various points within the model architecture. These gate nodes can be independently controlled by digital keys, allowing selective access to different portions of the model. This segmentation enables fine-grained security control while maintaining overall model functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If digital keys are interspersed within the model to control access, then security and authentication are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel authenticationVSAvoidmodel architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making different parts of the model have different access control properties. Gate nodes are strategically placed at specific locations within the model architecture where they provide the most effective security control. Each gate node can be independently authorized or denied based on the digital key provided, allowing localized security management without requiring complete model redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If gate nodes are added to control data flow, then authorization and security are improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring compromise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization controlVSAvoidcompromise detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor the behavior of the machine learning model and the digital keys used to control it. By analyzing patterns in data flow and model outputs, the system can detect anomalies that indicate compromise. The feedback loop allows the system to respond to security threats in real-time while maintaining ease of operation through automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12106212B2Machine learning model validation and authentication
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US12106212B2 patent drawing
  • US12106212B2 patent drawing
  • US12106212B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to methods and apparatus for validating and authenticating use of machine learning models. For example, various techniques are described herein to limit the vulnerability of machine learning models to attack and/or exploitation of the model for malicious use, and for detecting when such attack/exploitation has occurred. Additionally, various embodiments described herein promote the protection of sensitive and/or valuable data, for example by ensuring only licensed use is permissible. Moreover, techniques are described for version tracking, usage tracking, permission tracking, and evolution of machine learning models.