Machine Learning Model for Chemical Compound Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting new chemical compounds with desired properties using machine learning models are inefficient, as they often generate invalid compounds or those that do not match the target property profile, especially when starting from scratch, and lack practical guidance for optimizing lead compounds.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a trained machine learning model with an encoder, decoder, and linear transformation unit to convert molecular representations into continuous latent space vectors, allowing for the projection of lead compounds onto a target property profile subset, generating test compounds with validated molecular structures and matching property profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If non-linear prediction units are used to map latent vectors to chemical properties, then the model can capture complex property relationships, but it becomes difficult to identify and optimize molecules with desired properties since they could be located in multiple locations in the latent space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty prediction accuracyVSAvoidoptimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The model segments the property prediction task into two distinct components: a non-linear predictor that captures complex property relationships from latent vectors, and a separate linear mapping layer that enables systematic optimization. This segmentation allows each component to specialize - the non-linear predictor achieves high prediction accuracy while the linear mapping provides computational efficiency for finding molecules with desired properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The latent vector representation serves as an intermediary between the molecular structure (input) and the chemical properties (output). By introducing this intermediate continuous representation space, the model decouples the complex non-linear structure-property relationship from the optimization process, enabling efficient search for molecules with target properties through linear operations in the latent space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If completely new chemical compounds are generated based on desired property profiles, then novel candidates can be identified, but these compounds must first be synthesized and chemical building blocks are often not available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompound noveltyVSAvoidsynthesis feasibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The model performs preliminary filtering and ranking of generated compounds by predicting their properties and selecting only those that meet target criteria before synthesis. This preliminary action in silico reduces the number of compounds that need to be physically synthesized, focusing resources on the most promising candidates while ensuring building block availability can be checked beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where predicted properties of generated compounds are evaluated against target profiles, and this information feeds back into the generation process to refine subsequent compound suggestions. This feedback mechanism ensures that only compounds with desired properties and feasible synthesis routes are prioritized for actual synthesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If lead compounds are optimized by perturbing latent vectors, then new compounds can be generated, but this procedure yields a comparatively large number of invalid compounds and/or compounds whose properties do not match the desired property profile

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompound generation speedVSAvoidcompound validity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization process uses dynamic perturbation strategies where the magnitude and direction of latent vector changes are adjusted based on the validity and property quality of generated compounds. This dynamic approach allows the system to explore the latent space efficiently while maintaining high compound validity by adapting the perturbation strength to the local landscape of the latent space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the validity and property matching of generated compounds and uses this feedback to guide subsequent perturbations. Invalid compounds or those with poor property matches trigger adjustments in the perturbation strategy, such as reducing perturbation magnitude or changing direction, thereby improving the reliability of generated compounds while maintaining productive exploration of the chemical space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230335231A1Prediction of chemical compounds with desired properties
Publication Date: 2023.10.19 BAYER AG
  • US20230335231A1 patent drawing
  • US20230335231A1 patent drawing
  • US20230335231A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer programs disclosed herein relate to identifying chemical compounds having a desired property profile using a machine learning model.