Machine Learning Model for Foundational Item Identification in Concierge Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current delivery fulfillment systems face challenges in determining which items in an order are most important without customer input, leading to inappropriate substitutions and cancellations, resulting in customer dissatisfaction and item waste due to the lack of contextual information and sheer volume of potential recipes.

Innovation Solution

An online concierge system employs a machine learning model to identify foundational items by applying orders to a database of item groupings and using contextual data from third-party systems, such as recipe information, to visually distinguish and prioritize essential items in the order, enabling appropriate substitutions or cancellations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system analyzes all potential recipes and contextual data to identify important items, then identification accuracy improves, but computational complexity and data processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the analysis by dividing items into different categories (foundational items, substituteable items, essential items) based on their importance to the order. This segmentation allows the system to apply different analysis depths to different item groups, improving identification accuracy for foundational items while reducing overall computational complexity by not analyzing all items with the same level of detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels of analysis and visual distinction for different items in the order. Foundational items receive enhanced visual distinction and more thorough analysis, while other items receive standard processing. This allows the system to focus computational resources on identifying and protecting critical items without unnecessarily analyzing every item in detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If the system requests customer input to identify important items, then identification accuracy improves, but order processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidorder processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing item groupings, categories, and analysis frameworks before the ordering process. The system has pre-defined what constitutes foundational items, substituteable items, and essential items based on historical data and item relationships. This preliminary preparation allows the system to quickly identify important items during order processing without requiring real-time customer input, thus maintaining high identification accuracy while minimizing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically identifying and categorizing items as foundational, substituteable, or essential without requiring customer input. The machine learning model and item grouping system autonomously analyze the order contents and determine item importance, eliminating the need for time-consuming customer consultations while maintaining accurate identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system makes no substitutions without customer confirmation, then customer satisfaction improves, but order fulfillment efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer satisfactionVSAvoidorder fulfillment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by creating a flexible substitution system that adapts to each item's categorization. Foundational items require customer confirmation before substitution, ensuring customer satisfaction for critical items. Substituteable items can be automatically replaced without customer input, maintaining order fulfillment efficiency. Essential items have predefined substitution protocols. This dynamic approach allows the system to optimize the balance between customer satisfaction and fulfillment efficiency based on item importance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by applying different substitution rules to different item categories. Foundational items receive high-protection treatment with customer confirmation requirements, while substituteable items receive standard automated substitution processing. This localized quality control ensures that customer satisfaction is prioritized for critical items without unnecessarily slowing down the fulfillment process for non-critical items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of information

If the system visually distinguishes all items, then information clarity improves, but user interface complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation clarityVSAvoiduser interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing visual distinction only for foundational items and essential items in the user interface, rather than all items. Foundational items are visually distinguished to highlight their importance and protect them from unauthorized substitution. This selective visual distinction maintains information clarity for critical items while keeping the user interface simple and uncluttered.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and highlights only the most important information (foundational items) in the user interface, separating them from the rest of the order items. This extraction approach provides clear information about which items require special attention without overwhelming the user with visual distinctions for every item, thus maintaining information clarity while preserving interface simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20230419381A1Machine learned model for managing foundational items in concierge system
Publication Date: 2023.12.28 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US20230419381A1 patent drawing
  • US20230419381A1 patent drawing
  • US20230419381A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An online concierge system receives, from a client device comprising a customer mobile application, an order comprising a list of one or more items for delivery to a destination location from a warehouse. The customer mobile application comprises a user interface. The online concierge system identifies a set of item groupings from a database that match the list of one or more items. The online concierge system applies the order and the set of item groupings to a machine learning model to produce a set of foundational items. The online concierge system sends for display, to the client device, an updated user interface comprising a foundational items graphical element that visually distinguishes the set of foundational items from other items in the list of one or more items.