Machine Learning Model Retraining for Medical Order Prior Authorization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical order processing systems face challenges in accurately determining whether a medical order requires prior authorization (PA) due to unpredictable changes in medical order conditions, leading to delays and improper processing.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning system is employed to train a predictive model using historical orders and payer responses, applying data balancing and multi-algorithmic approaches to generate a trained predictor that determines PA requirements for incoming orders, ensuring dynamic adaptation to changes without manual verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If static data models are used to determine PA requirements, then the system structure is simple, but the model cannot adapt to changing medical order conditions over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing medical order conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic model retraining by periodically updating the machine learning model with new historical order data and payer responses. The system transitions from a static model to a dynamic one that adapts to changing medical order conditions through automated retraining cycles, allowing the model to maintain accuracy as conditions evolve over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service through automated model retraining without requiring manual intervention. The machine learning system automatically retrieves new historical data, retrains the model, and deploys updated predictions, eliminating the need for manual model updates while maintaining adaptability to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual verification steps are implemented to improve accuracy, then prediction reliability improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously retraining the model in the background using historical data before predictions are needed. This preparatory retraining ensures the model is already optimized and accurate when processing new medical orders, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual verification during actual order processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by using historical payer responses to evaluate and improve model performance. The model learns from past predictions and actual outcomes, continuously refining its accuracy through feedback loops that incorporate real-world results, thereby maintaining high reliability without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the model is retrained frequently to maintain accuracy, then predictive accuracy is maintained, but computational resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies periodic action by retraining the model at scheduled intervals rather than continuously. This periodic retraining approach maintains predictive accuracy by updating the model with fresh historical data at appropriate frequencies, while avoiding unnecessary computational waste that would result from overly frequent retraining cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting retraining frequency and data sampling strategies to optimize the balance between accuracy and resource consumption. By modifying parameters such as the interval between retraining events and the amount of historical data used, the system achieves acceptable predictive accuracy while minimizing computational resource usage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11545248B2Machine learning systems for predictive modeling and related methods
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 EXPRESS SCRIPTS STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT INC
  • US11545248B2 patent drawing
  • US11545248B2 patent drawing
  • US11545248B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine learning system for training a data model to predict data states in medical orders is described. The machine learning system is configured to train a data model to predict whether a medical order requires prior authorization (“PA”) for medical orders within a medical order data set so that related systems may process incoming medical orders with PA determinations predicted by the data model. The machine learning system includes a first data warehouse system. The first prescription processing system generates a data model of historical orders and payer responses, apply a predictive machine learning model to the data model to generate a trained predictor of whether a medical order requires PA, associated with order data, apply the trained predictor to a plurality of production orders to determine PA for each of the plurality of production orders, and process the plurality of production orders with each associated PA determination.