ML Model for Supplier Transaction Acceptance Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Buyers face challenges in determining which suppliers accept certain transaction methods, such as credit card payments, due to the lack of publicly disclosed information and the time-consuming process of communicating with each supplier individually.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning predictive model is developed to predict the likelihood of a supplier accepting card transactions by training on inputs such as supplier data, card source information, previous model outputs, and outreach results, enabling automated and real-time transaction acceptability predictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If buyers communicate directly with each supplier to ask about accepted transaction methods, then they can obtain accurate information about transaction acceptability, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming when dealing with hundreds or thousands of suppliers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction acceptability information accuracyVSAvoidtime to determine supplier transaction preferences
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that acts as a mediator between buyers and suppliers. This system collects, stores, and manages transaction method preference data from suppliers in a centralized database, allowing buyers to query this information without directly contacting each supplier. The intermediary database serves as the mediation layer that resolves the time-cost issue while maintaining information accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by having suppliers pre-register their transaction method preferences in the database before any buyer needs to inquire. This advance preparation eliminates the need for real-time communication when buyers need the information. The data is collected and organized in advance, so when a buyer queries the system, the answer is immediately available without requiring the buyer to contact the supplier at that moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If buyers manually contact every supplier to determine transaction method acceptance, then they can ensure complete information coverage, but the complexity and resource requirements of the process increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of transaction method informationVSAvoidcomplexity of information collection process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by creating a single database infrastructure that serves multiple functions: storing supplier preferences, enabling buyer queries, supporting multiple transaction methods (card, check, wire, ACH), and accommodating numerous suppliers simultaneously. This universal platform replaces the need for individualized communication processes with each supplier, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive information coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating a digital representation of supplier transaction preferences in the database. Instead of requiring buyers to physically or verbally contact each supplier, the system copies the relevant information into a queryable format. This digital copy allows unlimited access and retrieval without additional complexity in the communication process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional methods are used to determine supplier transaction preferences, then the process can be simple in approach, but the productivity and scalability of the solution deteriorate when handling large numbers of suppliers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of implementation approachVSAvoidspeed of determining transaction acceptability across multiple suppliers
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies mechanics substitution by replacing the mechanical process of human-to-human communication with an automated electronic system. Instead of buyers manually calling or emailing suppliers, the system uses automated database queries and electronic data retrieval. This substitution dramatically increases productivity while maintaining simplicity in the user interface - buyers simply input supplier identifiers and receive instant results without the overhead of manual communication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250045686A1Systems and methods for transaction acceptance modeling
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20250045686A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045686A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045686A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for determining the likelihood of a supplier accepting a certain transaction method such as a payment card. Exemplary systems can generate a machine learning predictive model to determine the likelihood of a supplier accepting a card payment.