Machine Learning Model for Software Development Timeline Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of software development timelines makes it difficult to predict project completion and compliance with stated goals, as existing methods rely on subjective assessments and qualitative feedback, leading to inaccurate and unreliable predictions.

Innovation Solution

A system using machine learning models that processes quantitative and qualitative data to generate deterministic predictions for software development timelines, compliance achievement, and decision-making, leveraging natural language processing and category bucketing to analyze stakeholder inputs and improve efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If subjective assessment methods are used to predict development timelines, then the process is simple and easy to operate, but the prediction accuracy and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of predictionVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective human assessment mechanisms with an automated machine learning system. The ML model processes quantitative data (timing data, performance data) and qualitative data (logic input data) to generate objective predictions, eliminating the need for human subjectivity while improving prediction accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between raw data and prediction outputs. This intermediary systematically processes and analyzes data through learned patterns, transforming complex data relationships into accurate predictions without direct human intervention in the analysis process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If machine learning models process diverse data types to generate accurate predictions, then prediction reliability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal machine learning system that can process multiple types of data (quantitative timing data, performance data, and qualitative logic input data) through a single integrated model. This multi-functional approach handles diverse data types uniformly, improving reliability while managing complexity through consolidation rather than separate processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative data (logic input data) into quantifiable parameters through the machine learning model's internal representations. By changing the state of data from unstructured text to processed features, the system handles diversity in data types through a unified parameter space, improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If qualitative feedback from stakeholders is collected and processed, then the predictions become more accurate and comprehensive, but the time required for data collection and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual analysis of qualitative feedback with automated natural language processing within the machine learning system. The model processes logic input data (qualitative feedback) automatically, eliminating the time-consuming manual review process while maintaining the accuracy benefits of comprehensive qualitative analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous processing of qualitative data as it becomes available, rather than requiring batch processing or periodic analysis. The machine learning model can continuously ingest and process logic input data, timing data, and performance data, providing ongoing accurate predictions without interrupting development workflows for data collection and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240152333A1Systems and methods for modelling, predicting and suggesting function completion timelines
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20240152333A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152333A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152333A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are described herein for generating function completion timelines using machine learning models. The system may receive a validation request for validating completion of a function, determine a class of the logic input data, add the class to the validation request, input the validation request into a machine learning model for generating a prediction of a completion timeline, and generate the prediction of a completion date based on the completion timeline.