Machine Learning Model Training Automation via Problem Type Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Choosing a suitable machine learning model for training sample data is challenging due to poor training results and the time-consuming process of repeated model training, which affects the training progress.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for machine learning model training that involves a problem type selection interface, a type and model relationship table, and iterative training with parameter adjustment using convolution and fully connected layers, along with Backpropagation, to determine and optimize the appropriate machine learning model for specific tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple machine learning models are available for training, then model selection flexibility is improved, but the difficulty of choosing a suitable model increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel selection flexibilityVSAvoiddifficulty of choosing suitable model
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically selects and trains the most suitable machine learning model based on the problem type and sample data characteristics, eliminating the need for manual model selection by users. The training device autonomously determines the optimal model from multiple available models and performs iterative training until convergence criteria are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-establishes a mapping relationship between problem types and suitable machine learning models before training begins. This preliminary configuration allows the system to quickly identify and select the appropriate model based on the input problem type, avoiding time-consuming manual selection processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If repeated training is performed to improve model performance, then training accuracy is improved, but training time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements iterative training with feedback mechanisms where training results are continuously evaluated against convergence criteria. Based on the evaluation outcomes, the system automatically adjusts training parameters and selects the best performing model, eliminating unnecessary repeated training and reducing overall training time while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts training parameters such as learning rate, number of iterations, and model complexity based on real-time performance evaluation. This adaptive parameter adjustment allows the system to achieve optimal accuracy with minimal training iterations, avoiding time-consuming repeated training processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If manual model selection and training is performed, then control over the training process is improved, but the time required for training progress decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol over training processVSAvoidtraining progress speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The training device autonomously performs model selection, parameter optimization, and iterative training without requiring manual intervention. The system automatically evaluates training results against convergence criteria and adjusts parameters accordingly, significantly accelerating training progress while maintaining full control through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical operations with automated computational processes. Instead of requiring users to manually select models and adjust parameters, the system uses algorithmic approaches to automatically determine optimal models and training configurations, thereby increasing training productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12026592B2Machine learning model training method and machine learning model training device
Publication Date: 2024.07.02 HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO LTD
  • US12026592B2 patent drawing
  • US12026592B2 patent drawing
  • US12026592B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine learning model training method includes receiving a problem type to be processed, determining a machine learning model corresponding to the problem type, receiving sample data to train the determined machine learning model, analyzing training results of the determined machine learning model obtained after training is completed and displaying the training results that meet preset conditions, and providing a machine learning model corresponding to the training result that meets the preset conditions.