Machine Learning Model for Holistic Treatment Process Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Holistic medicinal processes face challenges in effectively addressing complex health conditions due to unknown dependencies between system components, making it difficult to determine the optimal adjustments to alleviate symptoms without causing negative impacts.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using machine-learning models to generate and monitor holistic treatment processes, which include treatment protocols for interdependent holistic classes, by receiving user data, executing machine-learning models, and modifying them based on performance data to improve symptom alleviation over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If holistic treatment processes are designed to address multiple interdependent system components, then the comprehensiveness of treatment is improved, but the complexity of determining optimal adjustments increases due to unknown dependencies between components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of treatmentVSAvoidcomplexity of determining optimal adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous monitoring of system components and uses the collected performance data to iteratively refine the machine learning model. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from actual outcomes and improve treatment recommendations over time, resolving the complexity of determining optimal adjustments by using empirical data rather than theoretical analysis of interdependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model dynamically adjusts treatment parameters based on monitored performance data and identified patterns in component interdependencies. By changing parameters iteratively based on observed outcomes, the system can navigate the complex relationships between components without requiring complete prior knowledge of all dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If adjustments are made to system components to alleviate symptoms, then treatment effectiveness is improved, but the risk of causing negative impacts on other components increases due to unknown dependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidnegative impacts on other components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system proactively identifies potential negative impacts by analyzing patterns in the performance data before they manifest as actual problems. By detecting early signs of adverse effects on dependent components, the system can adjust treatment parameters in advance to prevent harmful outcomes, thus maintaining treatment effectiveness while minimizing negative impacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

Continuous monitoring of all system components provides real-time feedback on the effects of adjustments. This enables the system to detect negative impacts early and reverse or modify adjustments before they cause significant harm, balancing treatment effectiveness with system-wide safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the machine-learning model is continuously modified using performance data, then the accuracy of treatment generation is improved, but the computational resources and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of treatment generationVSAvoidtime for model modification
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs selective model updates based on the significance of new performance data and changes in system patterns. Rather than continuously retraining the model with all available data, it updates only when necessary - when sufficient new information is gathered or when performance thresholds are crossed. This partial action approach maintains accuracy while reducing the time and computational resources required for model modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230230701A1Methods and Systems for Generating and Monitoring Holistic Treatment Processes
Publication Date: 2023.07.20 VELL LLC
  • US20230230701A1 patent drawing
  • US20230230701A1 patent drawing
  • US20230230701A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and method are provided for generating and monitoring holistic treatment process. A computing device may receive an identification of symptoms associated with a user profile. The computing device may execute a machine-learning model using the user profile and the symptoms to generate a holistic treatment process configured to alleviate the symptoms. The computing device may receive performance data corresponding to the execution of the holistic treatment process over a first time interval and, in response, modify the machine-learning model using the performance data to generate an updated machine-learning model. The updated machine-learning model may be configured to generate a revised holistic treatment process that is more likely to alleviate the one or more symptom. The computing device may then facilitate a presentation of the revised holistic treatment process.