ML Model for User Elasticity and Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional AI-backed recommendation methods are inefficient in processing heterogeneous data from disparate sources, leading to unreliable predictions and recommendations due to high processing power requirements and subjective expert interpretation.

Innovation Solution

A processor-based system generates elasticity scores and uplift scores for users by analyzing heterogeneous data, including transactional, campaign, and behavioral data, using machine learning models and graph convolution networks to provide targeted marketing campaign insights and item recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional AI-backed recommendation methods are used to analyze heterogeneous data, then prediction reliability may be improved, but processing power requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing power requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments users into distinct groups (winners, losers, stoplosers, stopwinners) based on their response to price changes and marketing campaigns. This segmentation allows the system to process heterogeneous data more efficiently by focusing computational resources on specific user subsets rather than treating all users uniformly, thereby reducing overall processing power requirements while maintaining prediction reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms heterogeneous data from multiple sources into standardized elasticity scores and uplift scores through parameter transformations. By converting diverse data formats into unified numerical parameters, the system reduces processing complexity and energy consumption while improving the reliability of predictions through more consistent and comparable data representations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If heterogeneous data from disparate sources is processed, then recommendation accuracy may be improved, but processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces elasticity scores and uplift scores as intermediary metrics that mediate between heterogeneous data sources and final recommendations. These intermediary parameters serve as a common language that translates diverse data formats into unified representations, enabling accurate recommendations while improving processing efficiency by avoiding the need to directly process and reconcile all heterogeneous data sources simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts key insights from heterogeneous data by identifying and isolating specific patterns (winners, losers, stoplosers, stopwinners) that drive recommendation accuracy. By extracting only the most relevant patterns rather than processing all data uniformly, the system maintains high recommendation accuracy while significantly improving processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Extent of automation

If expert interpretation is used to analyze user data, then subjectivity may be reduced, but reliability of predictions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated machine learning models that independently analyze user data and generate recommendations without requiring expert intervention. The system automatically segments users, calculates elasticity scores, determines uplift potentials, and generates personalized recommendations, thereby increasing automation while improving reliability through consistent, objective computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system continuously learns from user responses to marketing campaigns and adjusts its segmentation and scoring models accordingly. This feedback loop allows the automated system to improve its prediction reliability over time by adapting to changing user behaviors and preferences without requiring expert reanalysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240289835A1Systems and methods for machine learning model to calculate user elasticity and generate recommendations using heterogeneous data
Publication Date: 2024.08.29 ZS ASSOCIATES INC
  • US20240289835A1 patent drawing
  • US20240289835A1 patent drawing
  • US20240289835A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may include generating a feature table, hierarchical segments, and a graph network based on raw interaction data of a set of users. The method may further include generating a set of rankings for features in the feature table. The method may further include targeting hierarchical segments of the set of users through marketing campaigns and calculate a set of elasticity scores for the set of users in response to the marketing campaigns in the hierarchical segments. The method may further include generating item recommendations for the set of users based on the graph network. The method may further include executing a machine learning model to generate an uplift score for each user from the set of users based on at least one of the raw interaction data, the set of rankings, hierarchical segments, the set of elasticity scores, or the item recommendations.