ML Root Cause Analysis for Wireless Network Test Failures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional network testing solutions for cellular networks, such as 5G NR, are inadequate due to reliance on manual operations, which are time-consuming and prone to errors, and lack real-time updates and automatic configuration adjustments, leading to reduced interoperability, capacity, and security.

Innovation Solution

A network testing system utilizing machine learning to automate testing processes, provide real-time updates, and recommend configuration changes based on test failure analysis, thereby improving accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual operations are used for network testing, then testing can be performed with simple tools, but the process is time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system performs self-diagnosis and self-configuration through machine learning models that automatically analyze test results, identify failures, and recommend configuration changes without requiring manual intervention for each testing step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with automated machine learning-based systems that use algorithms to perform testing, analysis, and configuration tasks, substituting human operators with intelligent software agents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual testing processes are used, then system complexity is kept low, but real-time updates and automatic configuration adjustments are not available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where test results are automatically analyzed by machine learning models, which then generate real-time updates and configuration recommendations that are fed back into the network testing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning models are pre-trained with extensive network configuration data and failure patterns, enabling them to quickly analyze test results and provide configuration recommendations without requiring complex real-time decision-making processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If conventional testing methods are used, then interoperability issues can be identified, but the testing process lacks speed and reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork reliabilityVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs comprehensive network testing and analysis without requiring extensive manual setup or intervention, enabling rapid and reliable testing through self-service automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning models dynamically adjust testing parameters and configuration settings based on real-time analysis of test results, enabling the system to optimize testing efficiency and reliability by changing operational parameters adaptively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260006467A1Network testing using machine learning
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO LLC
  • US20260006467A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006467A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006467A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations are described herein for network testing using machine learning. In some implementations, a testing system receives an indication of a test failure associated with a test of a wireless communication system. The testing system stores one or more packet capture files associated with the test failure. A machine learning model associated with the testing system performs a root cause analysis of the test failure using the one or more packet capture files. The testing system determines a configuration update for the wireless communication system based on a result of the root cause analysis. The testing system generates an output that indicates the configuration update.