ML-Optimized Solid Phase Slug Flow Peptide Synthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing peptide synthesis methods rely on hardcoded experimental conditions and fixed process settings, which are inadequate for optimizing yield, purity, and efficiency, especially as the amino acid chain grows, and do not account for varying operating conditions during synthesis.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning engine is used to predict the most favorable operating conditions for peptide synthesis by simulating different scenarios, selecting optimal flow rate profiles, and adjusting parameters like temperature and reagent delivery, enabling automated control of the manufacturing process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If hardcoded experimental conditions and fixed process settings are used, then the manufacturing process is simple to implement, but the yield, purity, and efficiency cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidprocess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of operating conditions during peptide synthesis. The system continuously monitors synthesis progress and automatically adjusts flow rates, temperatures, and reagent delivery parameters in real-time based on machine learning predictions, transforming fixed process settings into adaptive dynamic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where synthesis data is continuously collected, analyzed by machine learning models, and used to adjust subsequent operating conditions. This closed-loop control enables optimization of yield and purity through iterative learning from actual synthesis outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If hardcoded experimental conditions are used, then the process is easy to operate, but the efficiency decreases as the amino acid chain grows

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system performs self-optimization by automatically analyzing synthesis data and adjusting operating conditions without manual intervention. The system serves itself by learning from past experiments and autonomously determining optimal parameters for subsequent syntheses, eliminating the need for manual process adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes multiple operating parameters including flow rates, temperatures, and reagent concentrations based on the growing amino acid chain length. Machine learning models predict optimal parameter combinations for each synthesis stage, enabling efficiency optimization that adapts to chain growth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed process settings are used, then the manufacturing process is stable, but it does not account for varying operating conditions during synthesis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to varying conditionsVSAvoidprocess stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary predictions using machine learning models to anticipate optimal operating conditions before each synthesis step. By pre-calculating optimal flow rates, temperatures, and reagent delivery parameters based on the specific peptide sequence and current chain state, the system prepares adaptive settings in advance while maintaining overall process reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static fixed settings to dynamic adaptive control where operating conditions continuously adjust in response to varying synthesis requirements. This dynamic adaptation maintains reliability by using machine learning predictions to guide changes, ensuring that variability serves optimization rather than creating instability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20220111348A1Machine Learning-Based Online Optimization Of Solid Phase Slug Flow Peptide Synthesis
Publication Date: 2022.04.14 MYTIDE THERAPEUTICS INC
  • US20220111348A1 patent drawing
  • US20220111348A1 patent drawing
  • US20220111348A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides computer-based methods and systems for controlling peptide synthesis. An embodiment begins by providing a manufacturing process that synthesizes peptides using solid phase slug flow. In turn, the manufacturing process is automated through use of a machine learning engine by selecting values for operating conditions for the manufacturing process. In such an embodiment, a given operating condition is flow rate profile. An embodiment generates an indication of the selected values for the operating conditions and controls the manufacturing process therewith.