Machine Learning Model for Employee Performance Trend Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for documenting employee performance fail to provide a comprehensive assessment over time, lacking mechanisms to analyze and track changes in quantitative feedback, leading to frustration for both employers and employees in evaluating performance changes.

Innovation Solution

An enterprise system that utilizes a machine-learned model to analyze qualitative feedback from performance evaluations over time, determining semantic meanings and generating a performance score that illustrates trends, thereby consolidating large amounts of data into a single, easily understandable metric.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional systems document performance evaluations for employees, then performance data is recorded and stored, but the systems fail to provide comprehensive assessment over time and require users to access individual evaluations to understand performance changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance trend informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a machine-learned model as an intermediary between the raw performance evaluation data and the users. This model automatically analyzes qualitative feedback, determines semantic meanings, and generates performance scores that represent trends over time. The intermediary processes the complex data behind the scenes, presenting simplified results to users without requiring them to navigate through individual evaluations, thus preventing information loss while maintaining system usability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the system provides detailed individual performance evaluations, then comprehensive data is available, but users need to access multiple evaluations to understand performance changes over time, increasing complexity and reducing ease of use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of performance assessmentVSAvoidperformance trend information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential performance trend information from multiple detailed evaluations and presents it separately as performance scores. The machine-learned model processes the qualitative feedback from individual evaluations and extracts key semantic meanings, then generates consolidated performance scores that represent trends over time. This allows users to access performance trend information directly without needing to review each individual evaluation, improving ease of operation while preserving access to detailed data when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If the system consolidates performance data into a single metric, then ease of understanding improves, but processing resources and network data usage are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing of performance evaluation data using a machine-learned model that determines semantic meanings from qualitative feedback and generates performance scores in advance. This preliminary action consolidates the data into a compact representation (performance scores) before storage and transmission, reducing the amount of data that needs to be processed and transmitted later. The system prepares the summarized performance information beforehand, making subsequent access and analysis more efficient while reducing overall processing resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20220318716A1Performance summarization over time
Publication Date: 2022.10.06 BETTERWORKS SYST
  • US20220318716A1 patent drawing
  • US20220318716A1 patent drawing
  • US20220318716A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described that provide users with performance summarizations over time. In some cases, an enterprise system receives a first performance evaluation for an employee at a first time, and receives a second performance evaluation for the employee at a second time. The enterprise system determines semantic meanings for text strings included in the first and second performance evaluations. The enterprise system inputs the semantic meanings into a machine-learned model trained to determine performance over time based at least in part on semantics of employee feedback. The enterprise system receives a performance score for the employee from the machine-learned model that reflects how the semantic meanings have changed over time. The enterprise system displays the performance score in a user interface, and may also display other performance scores for the employee, a rank of the employee based on the performance score, and/or other performance metrics.