Machine Learning Plan Validation for Industrial Process Schedules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of operational planning in process industries is costly and inefficient due to the need for multiple experienced resources to review complex operating plans and schedules, exacerbated by demographic gaps where junior resources take over experienced planners' responsibilities.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that uses feature extraction technology to identify a subset of critical process variables from historical data, filtering and grouping them based on importance and correlation, allowing for efficient plan validation and scheduling through Machine Learning technology.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple experienced resources review operating plans and schedules, then validation accuracy and reliability improve, but labor costs and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplan validation accuracyVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates the critical validation function from the manual review process by implementing an automated validation system that uses machine learning models to identify and flag anomalies in operating plans and schedules, separating the analytical task from human reviewers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual human review with an automated electronic validation system that uses algorithms and machine learning to perform the same validation function, eliminating the need for multiple experienced resources to manually review plans

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If experienced resources are used for plan review, then detection of anomalies and suggestions for improvement improve, but resource costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection capabilityVSAvoidlabor resource cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service validation system where the operating plans and schedules validate themselves through automated comparison against historical data and constraints, eliminating the need for external human reviewers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces human expertise with an automated electronic system that uses machine learning models trained on historical data to detect anomalies and suggest improvements, substituting human cognitive resources with computational resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If a comprehensive review of all process variables is conducted, then validation thoroughness improves, but complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation thoroughnessVSAvoidreview process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the critical subset of variables that need validation by using machine learning to identify and isolate the most significant parameters, eliminating the need to review all variables comprehensively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the validation process into distinct automated steps including data extraction, anomaly detection, and report generation, simplifying the overall complexity while maintaining thoroughness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If Machine Learning technology is used for variable selection, then efficiency and robustness of validation improve, but implementation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models on historical operating data before deployment, so that when the system is implemented, the variable selection and anomaly detection capabilities are already optimized, reducing the apparent complexity of implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11995127B2Validation of operating plans and schedules using machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 ASPENTECH CORPORATION
  • US11995127B2 patent drawing
  • US11995127B2 patent drawing
  • US11995127B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods and systems that help identify critical variables for more efficient and robust plan validation process. An example embodiment is a computer implemented method of industrial process control. The example method includes receiving in computer memory a dataset including initial process parameters representing operational data of a subject industrial process, and, using filtering operations and grouping operations on the dataset, identifying a subset of the process parameters indicative of control data for controlling the subject industrial process. The example method further includes automatically applying the identified subset of process parameters controlling the subject industrial process.